[Discussion] how to implement external power down for ARM

[shannon.zhao@linaro.org (Shannon Zhao)]

On 2015/4/30 17:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 30 April 2015 10:29:53 Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:08:05AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 30 April 2015 at 09:03, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 30 April 2015 09:03:22 Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking at adding support for external power down and reboot to
>>>>> ARM VMs.  With ACPI this is fairly straight forward and requires only
>>>>> adding a GPIO controller to the virt machine model and extending ACPI
>>>>> appropriately (see code here [1]). In addition Linaro LEG also have
>>>>> done a test that uses GPIO as power button to shutdown OS on fast model
>>>>> (see detail here [2]).
>>>>>
>>>>> However, we would like for this to work in systems that do not use
>>>>> ACPI as well. Adding a GPIO controller will still work, but we would
>>>>> need a generic way to tell Linux how to handle the GPIO events without
>>>>> adding any board-specific code to the VIRT platform. And what guest
>>>>> kernel driver do we need? Do we need another user-level daemon like acpid?
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that external shutdown can also be accomplished using the qemu
>>>>> guest agent [3], but maybe this is not a sufficiently stable approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any input on the approach to take here is very welcome.
>>>>
>>>> I would expect drivers/power/reset/gpio-poweroff.c to work in an identical
>>>> way with ACPI and DT, once you have added an ACPI binding for it.
>>>
>>> Looking at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-poweroff.txt
>>> that appears to be for "let the guest kernel turn off the system
>>> from the inside by toggling a GPIO line". What we want is the
>>> opposite: the external system (QEMU, in this case) toggles a GPIO
>>> line in order to request the guest kernel to do a clean shutdown
>>> or reboot. Or have I misunderstood what gpio-poweroff can do?
>>
>> No, you're correct.
>>
>> There are a few "power button" bindings around, but it looks like they
>> all rely on platform details and aren't that generic.
>>
>> With ACPI what events may be singalled? Just power off, or reset, etc?
>>
>> Which of these do we need to be able to handle with DT?
> 
> Actually, there are at least three different ways to do this:
> 
> a) have an input device send the KEY_POWEROFF or KEY_REBOOT events to
>    user space, and have some process (e.g. desktop environment, or daemon)

About this daemon, do we need a doc or spec to standardize it?

>    handle the event by doing an appropriate action. This seems to be
>    what ACPI does on x86, and a lot of device tree based systems do
>    the same thing using gpio-keys.
> 

Yeah, it seems like ACPI.

> b) Have a special driver that calls orderly_poweroff or orderly_reboot.
>    Only PowerPC (OPAL) uses the orderly_reboot() here, but a few platforms
>    (Xen, fsl_hypervisor, and some sparc and powerpc machines) as well
>    as some device drivers (thermal management etc) call this as well.
>    The effect is to call a user-configured binary (/sbin/reboot and
>    /sbin/poweroff by default).
> 

This looks good which reuses existing user space process.

> c) call ctrl_alt_del(): a bunch of platforms do this, and user space
>    has to configure whether this immediately calls kernel_restart(),
>    or sends SIGINT to the init process, which can then do an orderly
>    reboot. Again, highbank does this as the reboot action, but very
>    few other systems seem to do it, aside from the vt keyboard driver
>    that is used on all machines that have normal keyboard.
> 

This only supports reboot, but we also need poweroff.

> 	Arnd
> 

-- 
Shannon