From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com (santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com) Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 21:12:00 -0700 Subject: [V3 PATCH 3/5] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent() In-Reply-To: <1431045436-8690-4-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> References: <1431045436-8690-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1431045436-8690-4-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Message-ID: <554C3790.4010407@oracle.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 5/7/15 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI, > need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and > acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute. > > This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device > property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate > interface based on the booting architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit > --- > drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > include/linux/property.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c > index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/property.c > +++ b/drivers/base/property.c > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > /** > @@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev) > return count; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count); > + > +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev) > +{ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) Do you really need that IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ? In other words, dev->of_node should be null for !CONFIG_OF Regards, Santosh