linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s-anna@ti.com (Suman Anna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: add a rproc ops for performing address translation
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:55:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5550C2CD.5070207@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbaSD9tGVKhUkbL3JjtW9GuAR_fbWHG6rx1m_v9TDW0Osw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ohad,

On 05/09/2015 02:54 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> wrote:
>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>
>> The rproc_da_to_va API is currently used to perform any device to
>> kernel address translations to meet the different needs of the remoteproc
>> core/drivers (eg: loading). The functionality is achieved within the
>> remoteproc core, and is limited only for carveouts allocated within the
>> core.
>>
>> A new rproc ops, da_to_va, is added to provide flexibility to platform
>> implementations to perform the address translation themselves when the
>> above conditions cannot be met by the implementations. The rproc_da_to_va()
>> API is extended to invoke this ops if present, and fallback to regular
>> processing if the platform implementation cannot provide the translation.
>> This will allow any remoteproc implementations to translate addresses for
>> dedicated memories like internal memories.
> 
> Can you please provide specific examples where this is needed and how
> it is going to be used?

We will be using this for the WkupM3 remoteproc driver, and also using
it for a PRUSS remoteproc driver (on downstream kernel for now) on TI
AM335x/AM437x SoCs. The driver uses a firmware where all segments are
placed only in internal RAMs (nothing in DDR), and we use the remoteproc
core's ELF loader code to perform the loading. We need a way for the
remoteproc elf loader core to be able to translate these device
addresses into a kernel mapped addresses so that the loader code can
copy the firmware segments.

The previous attempt on this was to use a new resource type through the
resource table, whereby we are publishing and storing the internal
memory translations were stored in the remoteproc core [1].

regards
Suman

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5602981/

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-01 19:37 [PATCH v3 0/4] remoteproc: Introduce wkup_m3_rproc driver Dave Gerlach
2015-04-01 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API Dave Gerlach
2015-05-09  7:39   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-05-11 15:09     ` Suman Anna
2015-05-16  7:18       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-05-18 14:33         ` Dave Gerlach
2015-04-01 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: add a rproc ops for performing address translation Dave Gerlach
2015-05-09  7:54   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-05-11 14:55     ` Suman Anna [this message]
2015-04-01 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Documentation: dt: add bindings for TI Wakeup M3 processor Dave Gerlach
2015-05-11 17:28   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-04-01 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] remoteproc/wkup_m3: add a remoteproc driver for TI Wakeup M3 Dave Gerlach
2015-05-09  8:42   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-05-11 15:01     ` Suman Anna
2015-05-16  8:43       ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2015-04-29 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] remoteproc: Introduce wkup_m3_rproc driver Suman Anna
2015-05-02  8:45   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5550C2CD.5070207@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).