From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:54:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55516B58.20507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150511103130.GA3490@leverpostej>
On 05/11/2015 03:31 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> At boot time we round the memblock limit down to section size in an
> attempt to ensure that we will have mapped this RAM with section
> mappings prior to allocating from it. When mapping RAM we iterate over
> PMD-sized chunks, creating these section mappings.
>
> Section mappings are only created when the end of a chunk is aligned to
> section size. Unfortunately, with classic page tables (where PMD_SIZE is
> 2 * SECTION_SIZE) this means that if a chunk is between 1M and 2M in
> size the first 1M will not be mapped despite having been accounted for
> in the memblock limit. This has been observed to result in page tables
> being allocated from unmapped memory, causing boot-time hangs.
>
> This patch modifies the memblock limit rounding to always round down to
> PMD_SIZE instead of SECTION_SIZE. For classic MMU this means that we
> will round the memblock limit down to a 2M boundary, matching the limits
> on section mappings, and preventing allocations from unmapped memory.
> For LPAE there should be no change as PMD_SIZE == SECTION_SIZE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 4e6ef89..7186382 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1112,22 +1112,22 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Find the first non-section-aligned page, and point
> + * Find the first non-pmd-aligned page, and point
> * memblock_limit at it. This relies on rounding the
> - * limit down to be section-aligned, which happens at
> - * the end of this function.
> + * limit down to be pmd-aligned, which happens at the
> + * end of this function.
> *
> * With this algorithm, the start or end of almost any
> - * bank can be non-section-aligned. The only exception
> - * is that the start of the bank 0 must be section-
> + * bank can be non-pmd-aligned. The only exception is
> + * that the start of the bank 0 must be section-
> * aligned, since otherwise memory would need to be
> * allocated when mapping the start of bank 0, which
> * occurs before any free memory is mapped.
> */
> if (!memblock_limit) {
> - if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, SECTION_SIZE))
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, PMD_SIZE))
> memblock_limit = block_start;
> - else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, SECTION_SIZE))
> + else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, PMD_SIZE))
> memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> }
>
> @@ -1137,12 +1137,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
> high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
>
> /*
> - * Round the memblock limit down to a section size. This
> + * Round the memblock limit down to a pmd size. This
> * helps to ensure that we will allocate memory from the
> - * last full section, which should be mapped.
> + * last full pmd, which should be mapped.
> */
> if (memblock_limit)
> - memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, SECTION_SIZE);
> + memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
> if (!memblock_limit)
> memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 13:19 Memory size unaligned to section boundary Stefan Agner
2015-04-28 10:05 ` [REGRESSION?] ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for unaligned addresses (was Re: Memory size unaligned to section boundary) Hans de Goede
2015-05-05 14:22 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-05 14:38 ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-05 16:11 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-09 0:48 ` Laura Abbott
2015-05-06 10:11 ` Memory size unaligned to section boundary Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-06 10:43 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-06 10:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-06 11:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-09 13:38 ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-09 13:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-09 13:54 ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-09 13:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-09 14:06 ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-11 10:31 ` [PATCH] ARM: mm: handle non-pmd-aligned end of RAM Mark Rutland
2015-05-11 11:43 ` Stefan Agner
2015-05-13 13:40 ` Hans de Goede
2015-05-13 14:11 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-14 10:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-12 2:54 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2015-06-30 10:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-07-01 8:13 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55516B58.20507@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).