linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2 5/7] PCI/ACPI: Consolidate common PCI host bridge code into ACPI core
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:29:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55531967.70507@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430793970-11159-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>

Hi Jiang,

On 2015?05?05? 10:46, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Introduce common interface acpi_pci_root_create() and related data
> structures to create PCI root bus for ACPI PCI host bridges. It will
> be used to kill duplicated arch specific code for IA64 and x86. It may
> also help ARM64 in future.
>
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> index a965efa52152..a292ee33d74b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,30 @@ static inline acpi_handle acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle(struct pci_bus *pbus)
>   	return ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>   }
>
> +struct acpi_pci_root;
> +struct acpi_pci_root_ops;
> +
> +struct acpi_pci_root_info_common {
> +	struct pci_controller		controller;

There is another problem that this patch will lead to
compile error on ARM64 since ARM64 has basic ACPI support
in 4.1.

struct pci_controller		controller is not available
on ARM64, that's the reason why compile errors happens on ARM64.

How about move struct pci_controller to this head file?

because all the related file you changed in this patch set
are only compiled when CONFI_ACPI=y, so for x86,

struct pci_controller {
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
         struct acpi_device *companion;  /* ACPI companion device */
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
         void            *iommu;         /* IOMMU private data */
#endif
         int             segment;        /* PCI domain */
         int             node;           /* NUMA node */
};

I'm sure #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI .. #endif can be removed
with no harm, and for *iommu, we can remove the #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
with introducing little more memory on x86_32, after
that, the struct pci_controller is almost the same as ia64:

struct pci_controller {
         struct acpi_device *companion;
         void *iommu;
         int segment;
         int node;               /* nearest node with memory or 
NUMA_NO_NODE for global allocation */

         void *platform_data;
};

except void *platform_data;

On ARM64, the structure is almost the same, so how about
introduce

struct pci_controller {
         struct acpi_device *companion;  /* ACPI companion device */
         void            *iommu;         /* IOMMU private data */
         int             segment;        /* PCI domain */
         int             node;           /* NUMA node */
#ifdef CONFIG_IA64	
	void *platform_data;
#endif
};

in this file, then can be used for all architectures?

Thanks
Hanjun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05  2:46 [RFC v2 0/7] Consolidate ACPI PCI root common code into ACPI core Jiang Liu
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 1/7] ACPI/PCI: Enhance ACPI core to support sparse IO space Jiang Liu
2015-05-11 13:01   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 2/7] ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing interface for host bridge Jiang Liu
2015-05-11 13:04   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 3/7] ia64/PCI: Use common struct resource_entry to replace struct iospace_resource Jiang Liu
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 4/7] x86/PCI: Rename struct pci_sysdata as struct pci_controller Jiang Liu
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 5/7] PCI/ACPI: Consolidate common PCI host bridge code into ACPI core Jiang Liu
2015-05-11 13:36   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-13  5:36     ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-13  9:29   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-05-13 12:24     ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-13 13:25       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-14  1:09         ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-14  4:05           ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-14  4:42             ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 6/7] x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge Jiang Liu
2015-05-12 12:19   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-13  5:38     ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-05  2:46 ` [RFC v2 7/7] ia64/PCI/ACPI: " Jiang Liu
2015-05-05  3:10 ` [RFC v2 0/7] Consolidate ACPI PCI root common code into ACPI core Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55531967.70507@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).