linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ahs3@redhat.com (Al Stone)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: kernel: unify ACPI and DT cpus initialization
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:00:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5553C99A.5020706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431522769-11276-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

On 05/13/2015 07:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The code that initializes cpus on arm64 is currently split in two
> different code paths that carry out DT and ACPI cpus initialization.
> 
> Most of the code executing SMP initialization is common and should
> be merged to reduce discrepancies between ACPI and DT initialization
> and to have code initializing cpus in a single common place in the
> kernel.
> 
> This patch refactors arm64 SMP cpus initialization code to merge
> ACPI and DT boot paths in a common file and to create sanity
> checks that can be reused by both boot methods.
> 
> Current code assumes PSCI is the only available boot method
> when arm64 boots with ACPI; this can be easily extended if/when
> the ACPI parking protocol is merged into the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT]
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
[snip...]

These patches look pretty good so far, but I've only just started
reviewing them.  This one raised the question: do we know if there
is someone already working on parking protocol?  I've seen a form
of it working on AMD Seattles but I don't recall seeing any patches
being submitted -- I'll search archives again, just in case I missed
it the first time, but if there is someone working on it, that would
be good to know.

Thanks.

-- 
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3 at redhat.com
-----------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13 13:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM64: consolidate ACPI/DT SMP initialization Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM64: kernel: make cpu_ops hooks DT agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM64: kernel: unify ACPI and DT cpus initialization Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-13 22:00   ` Al Stone [this message]
2015-05-15  8:58     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-13 15:00     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5553C99A.5020706@redhat.com \
    --to=ahs3@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).