From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 02/12] arm64: smp_plat: add get_logical_index
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:47:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555AB246.5070102@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518175532.GC7064@leverpostej>
On 2015?05?19? 01:55, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:09:13PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> The PSCI MIGRATE_INFO_UP_CPU call returns a physical ID, which we will
>>> need to map back to a Linux logical ID.
>>>
>>> Implement a reusable get_logical_index to map from a physical ID to a
>>> logical ID.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
>>> index 8dcd61e..7abf757 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>>> #ifndef __ASM_SMP_PLAT_H
>>> #define __ASM_SMP_PLAT_H
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>>> +
>>> #include <asm/types.h>
>>>
>>> struct mpidr_hash {
>>> @@ -39,6 +41,20 @@ static inline u32 mpidr_hash_size(void)
>>> */
>>> extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>>> #define cpu_logical_map(cpu) __cpu_logical_map[cpu]
>>> +/*
>>> + * Retrieve logical cpu index corresponding to a given MPIDR.Aff*
>>> + * - mpidr: MPIDR.Aff* bits to be used for the look-up
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns the cpu logical index or -EINVAL on look-up error
>>> + */
>>> +static inline int get_logical_index(u64 mpidr)
>>> +{
>>> + int cpu;
>>> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
>>> + if (cpu_logical_map(cpu) == mpidr)
>>> + return cpu;
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +}
>>
>> Do we guarantee that mpidr here only contains the affinity bits (i.e. no
>> masking)?
>
> In the DT and ACPI probe paths we reject IDs with bits other than the
> aff bits set.
In ACPI case, it's explicitly clarified in the ACPI spec that only
contains aff bits.
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 10:38 [PATCHv2 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 01/12] arm/arm64: kvm: add missing PSCI include Mark Rutland
2015-05-19 3:37 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 02/12] arm64: smp_plat: add get_logical_index Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 17:55 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-19 3:47 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-05-19 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 9:10 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 03/12] arm64: smp: consistently use error codes Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 8:17 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 04/12] arm64: psci: remove unnecessary id indirection Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 8:21 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 05/12] arm64: psci: support unsigned return values Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 8:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 06/12] arm64: psci: account for Trusted OS instances Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 07/12] arm64: psci: kill psci_power_state Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 18:11 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 08/12] arm64: psci: remove ACPI coupling Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 8:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-19 9:18 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 09/12] arm64: psci: factor invocation code to drivers Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 8:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 10/12] drivers: psci: support native SMC{32,64} calls Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 17:49 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 11/12] ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 12/12] MAINTAINERS: add PSCI entry Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 17:49 ` [PATCHv2 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 9:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-19 9:32 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-19 15:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19 8:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-19 9:33 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555AB246.5070102@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).