From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:35:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC In-Reply-To: References: <1430827599-11560-1-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <1430827599-11560-5-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <20150515002527.GD31753@codeaurora.org> <5555A37B.1090105@huawei.com> <20150515193041.GO31753@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <555B9E7B.9000809@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/15/15 19:54, Brent Wang wrote: > >>> How about just send this patch for review not the whole patch set in >>> next version? >>> >> Yes a single patch is fine. I take it you want the patch to go >> through arm-soc with some Ack from us? > Yes, exactly. > The dts file includes the clock head file, this patch goes through > arm-soc is a good choice. One way to avoid that problem is to split the clock header file into its own patch and then duplicate that patch in two trees, one that goes through arm-soc and one that goes through clk. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project