From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bintian.wang@huawei.com (Bintian) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:52:37 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC In-Reply-To: <555B9E7B.9000809@codeaurora.org> References: <1430827599-11560-1-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <1430827599-11560-5-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <20150515002527.GD31753@codeaurora.org> <5555A37B.1090105@huawei.com> <20150515193041.GO31753@codeaurora.org> <555B9E7B.9000809@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <555BDAD5.1080301@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Stephen, On 2015/5/20 4:35, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 05/15/15 19:54, Brent Wang wrote: >> >>>> How about just send this patch for review not the whole patch set in >>>> next version? >>>> >>> Yes a single patch is fine. I take it you want the patch to go >>> through arm-soc with some Ack from us? >> Yes, exactly. >> The dts file includes the clock head file, this patch goes through >> arm-soc is a good choice. > > One way to avoid that problem is to split the clock header file into its > own patch and then duplicate that patch in two trees, one that goes > through arm-soc and one that goes through clk. > Thanks for your suggestion, I will talk about this with Hisilicon SoC maintainer XuWei. I have updated this patch based on your suggestion, could you help review patch "[PATCH v6 5/6] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC"? Thanks, Bintian