From: peda@lysator.liu.se (Peter Rosin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: prealloc_buffer_size and buffer_bytes_max
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 14:28:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555DCF69.9090008@lysator.liu.se> (raw)
Hi!
I got my hopes up when I read the commit message for c14e2591bf54
ASoC: atmel-pcm-dma: increase buffer_bytes_max. Quoting it:
atmel-pcm-dma is not limited to a buffer size of 64kB like
atmel-pcm-pdc. Increase buffer_bytes_max to 512kB to allow
for higher bit rates (i.e. 32bps at 192kHz) to work correctly.
By default, keep the prealloc at 64kB.
However, as I (think I) request a bigger buffer it still caps out at 64kB.
I'm using the latency argument of snd_pcm_set_params to control the buffer:
snd_pcm_set_params(pcm,
SND_PCM_FORMAT_S32_LE,
SND_PCM_ACCESS_RW_INTERLEAVED,
2, /* channels */
250000, /* rate */
0, /* do not resample */
90000); /* latency in us */
But snd_pcm_hw_params_get_buffer_size "only" returns 8192 frames (64kB)
even if I request 9us * 250kHz * 2 * 4 = 180kB. If I change the prealloc
from 64kB to 256kB I get a bigger buffer (and it works better too!).
Admittedly I backported this patch on top of the linux-3.18-at91
branch from the Atmel git repo, so there might be some support
missing that has gone in after 3.18?
Or have I completely misunderstood, and these are unrelated buffers?
Any insight in how I can get a big enough buffer without hacking the
prealloc is appreciated!
Cheers,
Peter
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 12:28 Peter Rosin [this message]
2015-05-21 12:35 ` prealloc_buffer_size and buffer_bytes_max Peter Rosin
2015-05-21 12:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-21 14:40 ` Peter Rosin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555DCF69.9090008@lysator.liu.se \
--to=peda@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).