From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:35:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v7 6/7] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC In-Reply-To: References: <1432117752-7074-1-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <1432117752-7074-2-git-send-email-bintian.wang@huawei.com> <555D09F3.7020506@codeaurora.org> <555D57BB.8080702@huawei.com> <555E1D55.1050907@codeaurora.org> <555EBCA4.9030303@huawei.com> Message-ID: <555F76D9.10308@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/22/15 11:30, Brent Wang wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > 2015-05-22 13:20 GMT+08:00 Bintian : >> >>> >>> Is pl011 the uart device? Does it have a node in DT somewhere? If it >>> does, then we could put the assigned-parents properties in that node so >>> that when the pl011 probes the uart1 clock has its parent set to >>> clk_150m. See the "Assigned clock parents and rates" section of >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt. >>> >> I will verify this. > Currently the "assigned-clock*" doesn't work for pl011 UART device > node, maybe we will > do some fix for its driver later or other modules. Why doesn't it work? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project