From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] XEN / PCI: Remove the dependence on arch x86 when PCI_MMCONFIG=y
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:55:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55654041.2040902@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556494D9.9090007@oracle.com>
On 2015?05?26? 23:44, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 10:54 AM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> On 26.05.2015 16:00, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2015 09:54 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On 05/26/2015 08:49 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>> In drivers/xen/pci.c, there are arch x86 dependent codes when
>>>>> CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG is enabled, since CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
>>>>> depends on ACPI, so this will prevent XEN PCI running on other
>>>>> architectures using ACPI with PCI_MMCONFIG enabled (such as ARM64).
>>>>>
>>>>> Fortunatly, it can be sloved in a simple way. In drivers/xen/pci.c,
>>>>> the only x86 dependent code is if ((pci_probe & PCI_PROBE_MMCONF) ==
>>>>> 0),
>>>>> and it's defined in asm/pci_x86.h, the code means that
>>>>> if the PCI resource is not probed in PCI_PROBE_MMCONF way, just
>>>>> ingnore the xen mcfg init. Actually this is duplicate, because
>>>>> if PCI resource is not probed in PCI_PROBE_MMCONF way, the
>>>>> pci_mmconfig_list will be empty, and the if (list_empty())
>>>>> after it will do the same job.
>>>>>
>>>>> So just remove the arch related code and the head file, this
>>>>> will be no functional change for x86, and also makes xen/pci.c
>>>>> usable for other architectures.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>>>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>>>> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/xen/pci.c | 6 ------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pci.c b/drivers/xen/pci.c
>>>>> index 6785ebb..9a8dbe3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/xen/pci.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/pci.c
>>>>> @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@
>>>>> #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
>>>>> #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
>>>>> #include "../pci/pci.h"
>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
>>>>> -#include <asm/pci_x86.h>
>>>>> -#endif
>>>>>
>>>>> static bool __read_mostly pci_seg_supported = true;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -222,9 +219,6 @@ static int __init xen_mcfg_late(void)
>>>>> if (!xen_initial_domain())
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if ((pci_probe & PCI_PROBE_MMCONF) == 0)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> if (list_empty(&pci_mmcfg_list))
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (+Stefano who is Xen ARM maintainer)
>>>>
>>>> This will not build on x86 since pci_mmcfg_list since, for example,
>>>> pci_mmcfg_list is declared in pci_x86.h.
>>>
>>>
>>> And now really with Stefano and with parsable first sentence, sorry:
>>>
>>>
>>> This will not build on x86 since pci_mmcfg_list, for example, is
>>> declared in pci_x86.h.
>>
>> With this patch set, not any more. Please see preceding patches.
>
>
> OK, I didn't notice this was part of a series.
Sorry, I didn't cc you all of those patches.
>
> Then if not having PCI_PROBE_MMCONF bit set is indeed equivalent to
> list_empty(&pci_mmcfg_list), is there any reason for this flag to
> (continue to) exist? (and also for pci_mmcfg_arch_init_failed.)
I think PCI_PROBE_MMCONF bit is needed for early init of pci mmconfig in
the x86 arch related code, but for xen_mcfg_late(), it's called after
acpi_init() which the mmconfig is ready for use if it's available (the
pci_mmcfg_list is empty or not), so not having PCI_PROBE_MMCONF bit set
is equivalent list_empty(&pci_mmcfg_list) is not suitable for all cases,
but I think it will be ok after mmconfig is initialized.
I think my change log is misleading and needs updating :)
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-26 12:49 [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 16:58 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-05-26 17:20 ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-27 8:21 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-09-07 4:14 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-09-07 8:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-08 13:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-27 9:47 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-05-27 11:29 ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86, pci: Clean up comment about buggy MMIO config space access for AMD Fam10h CPUs Hanjun Guo
2015-08-31 12:04 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86, pci: Abstract PCI config accessors and use AMD Fam10h workaround exclusively Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86, pci: Reorder logic of pci_mmconfig_insert() function Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 17:08 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-27 8:06 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-06-02 13:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-06-04 9:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-04 10:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-06-04 12:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-08 2:57 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-08 15:14 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-31 11:01 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-07 9:59 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-08 15:07 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 13:47 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-11 11:20 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-11 12:35 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-14 9:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-14 11:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-14 14:55 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-25 16:02 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-25 16:19 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-15 13:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-15 14:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-10-15 16:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-15 18:51 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] pci, acpi, mcfg: Provide generic implementation of MCFG code initialization Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86, pci: mmconfig_{32, 64}.c code refactoring - remove code duplication Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86, pci, ecam: mmconfig_64.c becomes default implementation for ECAM driver Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] pci, acpi, mcfg: Share ACPI PCI config space accessors Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] XEN / PCI: Remove the dependence on arch x86 when PCI_MMCONFIG=y Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 13:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-05-26 14:00 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-05-26 14:54 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-05-26 15:44 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-05-27 3:55 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-05-26 12:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM64 / PCI / ACPI: support for ACPI based PCI hostbridge init Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 15:12 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-05-27 7:31 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-26 17:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-26 17:24 ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-27 0:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-27 3:57 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-06-08 12:05 ` Jagan Teki
2015-06-10 2:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-15 19:15 ` Jon Masters
2015-10-15 23:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-15 23:49 ` Jon Masters
2015-12-07 20:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55654041.2040902@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).