From: labbott@redhat.com (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/9] IOMMU probe deferral support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:36:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5567522E.3080003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431644410-2997-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
On 05/14/2015 04:00 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series attempts to implement support for deferring probe of both
> IOMMU drivers and bus master drivers.
>
> The relationship between bus masters and IOMMUs creates a strong ordering
> during initialization of devices. As in the general case IOMMUs are hidden
> behind the DMA mapping API, IOMMU support relies on the automatic setup of DMA
> operations without any direct intervention of bus master drivers.
>
> DMA operations are set up when platform devices are added to the system. This
> requires IOMMUs to be available at that time. On systems where ordering of
> device add and probe can't be guaranteed (such as, but not limited to,
> DT-based systems) this caused incorrect DMA operation setup. This has been
> addressed by a patches series [1] that introduced a DT-based early
> registration mechanism for IOMMUs.
>
> However, that mechanism fails to address all issues. Various dependencies
> exist between IOMMU devices and other devices, in particular on clocks and on
> power domains (as mentioned by Marek in [2]). While there are mechanisms to
> handle some of them without probe deferral (for instance by using the
> OF_DECLARE macros to register clock drivers), generalizing those mechanisms
> would essentially recreate a probe ordering mechanism similar to link order
> probe ordering and couldn't really scale.
>
> Additionally, IOMMUs could also be present hot-pluggable devices and depend on
> resources that are thus hot-plugged. OF_DECLARE wouldn't help in that case.
> For all those reasons probe deferral for IOMMUs has been considered as desired
> if it can be implemented cleanly. For more in-depth information see [3].
>
> This RFC series is a first attempt at implementing IOMMU probe deferral
> support cleanly.
>
> The core idea is to move setup of DMA operations from device add time to
> device probe time, implemented in patch 6/9. It could be possible to move
> setup of other DMA parameters (namely masks and offset) to probe time as well,
> but that change would be more intrusive and has a higher risk of introducing
> regressions. For that reason I've decided to keep DMA masks and offset setup
> at device add time and thus split DMA configuration in masks and operations
> (patch 5/9). This can be revisited if we decide that the DMA mapping API
> shouldn't require masks and offset to be set before probe time.
>
> Patch 8/9 then defers probe of bus master drivers when required IOMMUs are not
> available yet. This requires knowing when a failed IOMMU lookup should be
> considered as permanent or temporary. I've reused the OF_DECLARE_IOMMU for
> this purpose, considering that the presence of a driver compatible with the
> IOMMU DT node indicates that the failure is temporary and probing of the bus
> master device should be deferred.
>
> Note that only IOMMU drivers using the recent .of_xlate() mechanism for
> DT-based IOMMU reference can cause probe deferral of bus master devices. The
> .add_device() mechanism isn't supported in this case.
>
> As an example I've converted the ipmmu-vmsa driver to the new API in patch 9/9.
>
> At this point many enhancements are possible, but I'd like to receive feedback
> on the proposed approach before basing more patches on this series. One
> particular point I would like to address (or see being addressed) in the
> future is the use of struct iommu_ops with of_iommu_get_ops() and
> of_iommu_set_ops(). I believe we should introduct a struct iommu and register
> IOMMU instances instead of IOMMU operations. That should bring us one step
> closer to removing bus_set_iommu().
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg382787.html
> [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-February/323238.html
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/16/345
>
> Laurent Pinchart (9):
> arm: dma-mapping: Don't override dma_ops in arch_setup_dma_ops()
> arm: dma-mapping: Support IOMMU mappings spanning the full 32 bits
> range
> of: dma: Move range size workaround to of_dma_get_range()
> of: dma: Make of_dma_deconfigure() public
> of: dma: Split of_configure_dma() into mask and ops configuration
> drivers: platform: Configure dma operations at probe time
> iommu: of: Document the of_iommu_configure() function
> iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error
> iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Use DT-based instantiation
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-iommu.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 21 +++--
> drivers/base/platform.c | 9 ++
> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 189 +++++++++++++--------------------------
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 29 +++++-
> drivers/of/address.c | 20 ++++-
> drivers/of/device.c | 77 ++++++++++------
> drivers/of/of_pci.c | 3 +-
> drivers/of/platform.c | 16 ++--
> include/linux/of_device.h | 14 ++-
> 10 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)
>
I no longer have hardware to test this on but the entire approach looks
reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 23:00 [RFC/PATCH 0/9] IOMMU probe deferral support Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/9] arm: dma-mapping: Don't override dma_ops in arch_setup_dma_ops() Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-27 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/9] arm: dma-mapping: Support IOMMU mappings spanning the full 32 bits range Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-19 10:17 ` Robin Murphy
2015-05-24 22:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/9] of: dma: Move range size workaround to of_dma_get_range() Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-27 17:59 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-28 2:37 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/9] of: dma: Make of_dma_deconfigure() public Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-29 14:04 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/9] of: dma: Split of_configure_dma() into mask and ops configuration Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 13:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-29 14:19 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/9] drivers: platform: Configure dma operations at probe time Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-15 23:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-19 10:39 ` Robin Murphy
2015-05-24 22:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/9] iommu: of: Document the of_iommu_configure() function Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 13:02 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 8/9] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-28 13:31 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-14 23:00 ` [RFC/PATCH 9/9] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Use DT-based instantiation Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-27 13:26 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/9] IOMMU probe deferral support Marek Szyprowski
2015-05-28 17:36 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2015-06-11 16:25 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5567522E.3080003@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).