From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dinguyen@opensource.altera.com (Dinh Nguyen)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:57:07 -0500
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/4] edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
In-Reply-To: <20150605091731.GA3679@pd.tnic>
References: <1433428128-7292-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
 <1433428128-7292-3-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
 <55706E25.8050105@opensource.altera.com>
 <5570C479.7010902@opensource.altera.com> <20150604220609.GK3795@pd.tnic>
 <5570D0D0.9030803@opensource.altera.com> <20150605091731.GA3679@pd.tnic>
Message-ID: <5571AAB3.2000005@opensource.altera.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Boris,

On 6/5/15 4:17 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:27:28PM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> This is my mistake. I applied Alan Tull's patch for suspend-to-ram which
>> also touches drivers/edac/altera_edac.c.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dinguyen/linux.git/commit/?h=socfpga_for_next_arria10&id=d44a92eb044f4cc1abf34a790d647e9fa356d7b0
>>
>> I think I will have to ask Alan to split up his patch and send the part
>> that touches altera_edac.c to linux-edac.
> 
> Nah, that's fine. If it is that hunk adding altr_sdram_prepare(), he can
> simply add my ACK for the EDAC bits:
> 
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 

Thanks alot for doing that! But I have sent you a separate patch for
this. It would have caused a merge conflict for v4.2 if I left the
suspend-to-ram patch as is.

Thanks,

Dinh