From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: michal.simek@xilinx.com (Michal Simek) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:39:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] dma: Add Xilinx AXI Central Direct Memory Access Engine driver support In-Reply-To: <1433852683.24094.8.camel@x220> References: <1432228035-6569-1-git-send-email-appanad@xilinx.com> <1432290653.27695.97.camel@x220> <557681A7.7080202@monstr.eu> <55769132.6070601@monstr.eu> <1433837720.16887.42.camel@x220> <5576C2F5.3050806@monstr.eu> <1433851175.16887.83.camel@x220> <5576D83D.2000006@monstr.eu> <1433852683.24094.8.camel@x220> Message-ID: <5576DE8A.3030704@xilinx.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/09/2015 02:24 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 14:12 +0200, Michal Simek wrote >> ok. Will check all our drivers we have to get it synchronized but I >> expect that a lot of drivers have problems there. > > So do I. Cleaning that all up would add a lot of churn. I'm _not_ > volunteering to do that. Wolfram? You have been pretty successful with fixing owner field. This looks like similar task. > > What I decided to do was to (try to) comment on each patch that adds > another license mismatch. The idea being that this might annoy someone > into suggesting a (mostly) fool proof alternative to MODULE_LICENSE(). > That didn't really work out yet (though Julia's and your response is > encouraging) > > On the sunny side I note that very few new mismatches get added (at > least, I tricked myself into believing that). I expect that they will still come till this is properly reported by any tool. And fixed everywhere because people just c&p drivers. Thanks, Michal