[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[dinh.linux at gmail.com]

Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,

This is an updated pull request for the supend-to-ram patch that has the
EDAC code removed in order to avoid a merge conflict.

Thanks,
Dinh

The following changes since commit c65b99f046843d2455aa231747b5a07a999a9f3d:

  Linux 4.1-rc6 (2015-05-31 19:01:07 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dinguyen/linux.git socfpga_updates_for_v4.2_part2_v2

for you to fetch changes up to ae03cc09f379f1bd69cd0534fb2c40c087e7cea1:

  ARM: socfpga: support suspend to ram (2015-06-05 08:27:43 -0500)

----------------------------------------------------------------
SoCFPGA update for v4.2, part 2
- Add support for suspend to RAM

----------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Tull (1):
      ARM: socfpga: support suspend to ram

 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig        |  10 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile       |   1 +
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h         |   6 +-
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c           | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/self-refresh.S | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c      |   6 +-
 6 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/self-refresh.S

[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[Dinh Nguyen]

On 06/10/2015 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> dinh.linux at gmail.com writes:
> 
>> Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
>>
>> This is an updated pull request for the supend-to-ram patch that has the
>> EDAC code removed in order to avoid a merge conflict.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dinh
>>
>> The following changes since commit c65b99f046843d2455aa231747b5a07a999a9f3d:
>>
>>   Linux 4.1-rc6 (2015-05-31 19:01:07 -0700)
> 
> Why v4.1-rc6?  
> 
> Are there specific dependencies there?  If not, we prefer these pulls to
> be on older -rc tags (typically nothing past where arm-soc/master is).

No dependency, I just saw that arm-soc/for-next was at -rc6. I remember
seeing an email that you should based to an early -rc, or the same -rc
as the for-next branch?

> 
> If there are no deps, could you respin this against -rc2/-rc3, or you
> could also rebase on top of your previous socfpga_updates_for_v4.2 as
> well (which itself is based on -rc2.)
> 

Yes, I can do that as, I have an additional patch to be included.

Thanks,
Dinh

[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[Kevin Hilman]

dinh.linux at gmail.com writes:

> Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
>
> This is an updated pull request for the supend-to-ram patch that has the
> EDAC code removed in order to avoid a merge conflict.
>
> Thanks,
> Dinh
>
> The following changes since commit c65b99f046843d2455aa231747b5a07a999a9f3d:
>
>   Linux 4.1-rc6 (2015-05-31 19:01:07 -0700)

Why v4.1-rc6?  

Are there specific dependencies there?  If not, we prefer these pulls to
be on older -rc tags (typically nothing past where arm-soc/master is).

If there are no deps, could you respin this against -rc2/-rc3, or you
could also rebase on top of your previous socfpga_updates_for_v4.2 as
well (which itself is based on -rc2.)

Kevin

[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[Dinh Nguyen]

On 06/10/2015 06:03 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
>> dinh.linux at gmail.com writes:
>>
>>> Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
>>>
>>> This is an updated pull request for the supend-to-ram patch that has the
>>> EDAC code removed in order to avoid a merge conflict.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dinh
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit c65b99f046843d2455aa231747b5a07a999a9f3d:
>>>
>>>   Linux 4.1-rc6 (2015-05-31 19:01:07 -0700)
>>
>> Why v4.1-rc6?
>>
>> Are there specific dependencies there?  If not, we prefer these pulls to
>> be on older -rc tags (typically nothing past where arm-soc/master is).
>>
>> If there are no deps, could you respin this against -rc2/-rc3, or you
>> could also rebase on top of your previous socfpga_updates_for_v4.2 as
>> well (which itself is based on -rc2.)
> 
> Actually, no need to respin since this is just a single patch.  I've
> picked it from your branch and applied it to socfpga/soc and merged
> into next/soc.  But please keep in mind the above for future pull
> reqs.  Thanks.
> 

Ok, will do.

Thanks,

Dinh

[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[Kevin Hilman]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> wrote:
> dinh.linux at gmail.com writes:
>
>> Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
>>
>> This is an updated pull request for the supend-to-ram patch that has the
>> EDAC code removed in order to avoid a merge conflict.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dinh
>>
>> The following changes since commit c65b99f046843d2455aa231747b5a07a999a9f3d:
>>
>>   Linux 4.1-rc6 (2015-05-31 19:01:07 -0700)
>
> Why v4.1-rc6?
>
> Are there specific dependencies there?  If not, we prefer these pulls to
> be on older -rc tags (typically nothing past where arm-soc/master is).
>
> If there are no deps, could you respin this against -rc2/-rc3, or you
> could also rebase on top of your previous socfpga_updates_for_v4.2 as
> well (which itself is based on -rc2.)

Actually, no need to respin since this is just a single patch.  I've
picked it from your branch and applied it to socfpga/soc and merged
into next/soc.  But please keep in mind the above for future pull
reqs.  Thanks.

Kevin

[GIT PULL] SoCFPGA updates for v4.2, part 2, version 2

[Kevin Hilman]

Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> writes:

> On 06/10/2015 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> dinh.linux at gmail.com writes:
>> 
>>> Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
>>>
>>> This is an updated pull request for the supend-to-ram patch that has the
>>> EDAC code removed in order to avoid a merge conflict.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dinh
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit c65b99f046843d2455aa231747b5a07a999a9f3d:
>>>
>>>   Linux 4.1-rc6 (2015-05-31 19:01:07 -0700)
>> 
>> Why v4.1-rc6?  
>> 
>> Are there specific dependencies there?  If not, we prefer these pulls to
>> be on older -rc tags (typically nothing past where arm-soc/master is).
>
> No dependency, I just saw that arm-soc/for-next was at -rc6. I remember
> seeing an email that you should based to an early -rc, or the same -rc
> as the for-next branch?

Same -rc as the master branch preferably.

Thanks,

Kevin