linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow dynamic mapping of physical/virtual interrupts
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:44:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557EF2EB.7090604@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433783045-8002-7-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Hi Marc,
On 06/08/2015 07:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to be able to feed physical interrupts to a guest, we need
> to be able to establish the virtual-physical mapping between the two
> worlds.
> 
> The mapping is kept in a rbtree, indexed by virtual interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h |  18 ++++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c    | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 4f9fa1d..33d121a 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,14 @@ struct vgic_io_device {
>  	struct kvm_io_device dev;
>  };
>  
> +struct irq_phys_map {
> +	struct rb_node		node;
> +	u32			virt_irq;
> +	u32			phys_irq;
> +	u32			irq;
> +	bool			active;
> +};
> +
>  struct vgic_dist {
>  	spinlock_t		lock;
>  	bool			in_kernel;
> @@ -256,6 +264,10 @@ struct vgic_dist {
>  	struct vgic_vm_ops	vm_ops;
>  	struct vgic_io_device	dist_iodev;
>  	struct vgic_io_device	*redist_iodevs;
> +
> +	/* Virtual irq to hwirq mapping */
> +	spinlock_t		irq_phys_map_lock;
> +	struct rb_root		irq_phys_map;
>  };
>  
>  struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
> @@ -307,6 +319,9 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>  		struct vgic_v2_cpu_if	vgic_v2;
>  		struct vgic_v3_cpu_if	vgic_v3;
>  	};
> +
> +	/* Protected by the distributor's irq_phys_map_lock */
> +	struct rb_root	irq_phys_map;
>  };
>  
>  #define LR_EMPTY	0xff
> @@ -331,6 +346,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int irq_num,
>  void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg);
>  int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  int kvm_vgic_vcpu_active_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				       int virt_irq, int irq);
> +int vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct irq_phys_map *map);
>  
>  #define irqchip_in_kernel(k)	(!!((k)->arch.vgic.in_kernel))
>  #define vgic_initialized(k)	(!!((k)->arch.vgic.nr_cpus))
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 59ed7a3..c6604f2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/rbtree.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
> @@ -84,6 +85,8 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static struct vgic_lr vgic_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
>  static void vgic_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr, struct vgic_lr lr_desc);
> +static struct irq_phys_map *vgic_irq_map_search(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +						int virt_irq);
>  
>  static const struct vgic_ops *vgic_ops;
>  static const struct vgic_params *vgic;
> @@ -1585,6 +1588,112 @@ static irqreturn_t vgic_maintenance_handler(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static struct rb_root *vgic_get_irq_phys_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     int virt_irq)
> +{
> +	if (virt_irq < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
> +		return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.irq_phys_map;
> +	else
> +		return &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.irq_phys_map;
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_phys_map *vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				       int virt_irq, int irq)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> +	struct rb_root *root = vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, virt_irq);
> +	struct rb_node **new = &root->rb_node, *parent = NULL;
> +	struct irq_phys_map *new_map;
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +	struct irq_data *data;
> +	int phys_irq;
> +
> +	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +	if (!desc) {
> +		kvm_err("kvm_arch_timer: can't obtain interrupt descriptor\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> +	while (data->parent_data)
> +		data = data->parent_data;
> +
> +	phys_irq = data->hwirq;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +
> +	/* Boilerplate rb_tree code */
> +	while (*new) {
> +		struct irq_phys_map *this;
> +
> +		this = container_of(*new, struct irq_phys_map, node);
> +		parent = *new;
> +		if (this->virt_irq < virt_irq)
> +			new = &(*new)->rb_left;
> +		else if (this->virt_irq > virt_irq)
> +			new = &(*new)->rb_right;
> +		else {
> +			new_map = this;
in case the mapping already exists you don't update the mappping or
return an error. Is it what you want here?

> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	new_map = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_map), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!new_map)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	new_map->virt_irq = virt_irq;
> +	new_map->phys_irq = phys_irq;
> +	new_map->irq = irq;
> +
> +	rb_link_node(&new_map->node, parent, new);
> +	rb_insert_color(&new_map->node, root);
> +
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +	return new_map;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_phys_map *vgic_irq_map_search(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +						int virt_irq)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> +	struct rb_root *root = vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, virt_irq);
> +	struct rb_node *node = root->rb_node;
> +	struct irq_phys_map *this = NULL;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +
> +	while (node) {
> +		this = container_of(node, struct irq_phys_map, node);
> +
> +		if (this->virt_irq < virt_irq)
> +			node = node->rb_left;
> +		else if (this->virt_irq > virt_irq)
> +			node = node->rb_right;
> +		else
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +	return this;
> +}
> +
> +int vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct irq_phys_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> +
> +	if (!map)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +	rb_erase(&map->node, vgic_get_irq_phys_map(vcpu, map->virt_irq));
> +	spin_unlock(&dist->irq_phys_map_lock);
> +
> +	kfree(map);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> @@ -1835,6 +1944,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.vgic.lock);
Don't you deallocate the rbtree nodes here? Also in the future with EOI
mode == 1 we will need to complete the physical IRQ in place of the guest.

- Eric
> +	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.vgic.irq_phys_map_lock);
>  	kvm->arch.vgic.in_kernel = true;
>  	kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model = type;
>  	kvm->arch.vgic.vctrl_base = vgic->vctrl_base;
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-15 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-08 17:03 [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Active interrupt state switching for shared devices Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix ordering of timer/GIC on guest entry Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 11:29   ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-30 20:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Move vgic handling to a non-preemptible section Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 11:38   ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-30 20:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Convert struct vgic_lr to use bitfields Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 13:12   ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-10 17:23   ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-10 18:04     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW irq to be encoded in LR Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 13:21   ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 14:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 11:53   ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 12:39     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 13:21     ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-17 13:34       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Relax vgic_can_sample_irq for edge IRQs Marc Zyngier
2015-06-30 20:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01  9:17     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 11:58       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 18:18         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-02 16:23           ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-03  9:50             ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03  9:57               ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow dynamic mapping of physical/virtual interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11  8:43   ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11  8:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 15:44   ` Eric Auger [this message]
2015-06-16  8:28     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-16  9:10       ` Eric Auger
2015-06-30 20:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 10:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 11:45       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW interrupts to be queued to a guest Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11  8:44   ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11  9:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11  9:44       ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 10:02         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 16:11           ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:51   ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 12:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get, set}_phys_irq_active Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:11   ` Eric Auger
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm/arm64: timer: Allow the timer to control the active state Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow non-shared device HW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:11   ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:37     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:50       ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18  8:37         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-18 17:51           ` Eric Auger
2015-06-30 20:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01  8:26     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01  8:57       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-10  8:33 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Active interrupt state switching for shared devices Eric Auger
2015-06-10  9:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 11:13     ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18  6:51 ` Eric Auger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=557EF2EB.7090604@linaro.org \
    --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).