From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:29:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code In-Reply-To: <557F6567.1070901@samsung.com> References: <1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1433366298-30016-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <5110473.q5rJrrjs9a@vostro.rjw.lan> <557F6567.1070901@samsung.com> Message-ID: <558040E9.2060008@windriver.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 15-06-15 07:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ") >>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include >>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles. >>> >>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >>> Cc: Viresh Kumar >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim >>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org >>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker >> >> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree. >> >> >>> --- >>> >>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see: >>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com >>> for the original series posting.] > > Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree? I have to keep a copy of the patch in the above series, since if I don't then we'll introduce build failures into the bisection history, so yes I'll handle it. Thanks, Paul. -- > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >