From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: d-gerlach@ti.com (Dave Gerlach) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:01:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] remoteproc: introduce rproc_get_by_phandle API In-Reply-To: References: <1432327530-48032-2-git-send-email-d-gerlach@ti.com> <1434566762-40702-1-git-send-email-d-gerlach@ti.com> Message-ID: <5582EB51.8010406@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Ohad, On 06/18/2015 04:04 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote: >> Allow users of remoteproc the ability to get a handle to an rproc by >> passing a phandle supplied in the user's device tree node. This is >> useful in situations that require manual booting of the rproc. >> >> This patch uses the code removed by commit 40e575b1d0b3 ("remoteproc: >> remove the get_by_name/put API") for the ref counting but is modified >> to use a simple list and locking mechanism and has rproc_get_by_name >> replaced with an rproc_get_by_phandle API. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach >> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna >> --- >> v4->v5: Fixed build error from of_find_node_by_phandle when !CONFIG_OF >> based on offline discussion. > > We can't rebase our for-next branch, so I've applied a > similar fix in a separate patch. > > Please check our for-next branch to make sure things still work for you. > Oh sorry about. Pulled your for-next, tried it out, everything looks good to me, thanks! Regards, Dave > Thanks, > Ohad. >