From: srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org (Srinivas Kandagatla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP and OCROM support
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:03:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5589AD83.8050704@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4a52f6c229bdabbfe9d21c03cb04593dde33ec4.1435066190.git.maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
Hi Sanchayan,
On 23/06/15 14:44, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> The patch adds support for the On Chip One Time Programmable Peripheral
> (OCOTP) and On Chip ROM (OCROM) support.
>
> On Vybrid OCOTP contain data like SoC ID, MAC address and OCROM has the
> revision ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++
> drivers/nvmem/Makefile | 2 ++
> drivers/nvmem/vf610-ocotp.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/nvmem/vf610-ocotp.c
>
Fantastic! diff is already looking good, when compared to v5 patches,
"drivers/soc/fsl/soc-vf610.c | 166
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++"
I think, We could even do a better job by moving qfprom and this driver
to a simple-mmio-nvmem provider, see below comments.
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> index 17f1a57..557c1e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> @@ -33,4 +33,15 @@ config NVMEM_SUNXI_SID
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called eeprom-sunxi-sid.
>
> +config NVMEM_VF610_OCOTP
> + tristate "VF610 SoCs OCOTP support"
> + depends on SOC_VF610
> + select REGMAP_MMIO
> + help
> + This is a driver for the 'OCOTP' available on various Vybrid
> + devices.
> +
> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> + will be called nvmem-vf610-ocotp.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/Makefile b/drivers/nvmem/Makefile
> index cc46791..a9ed113 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/Makefile
> @@ -11,3 +11,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_QFPROM) += nvmem_qfprom.o
> nvmem_qfprom-y := qfprom.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM_SUNXI_SID) += nvmem-sunxi-sid.o
> nvmem-sunxi-sid-y := sunxi-sid.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM_VF610_OCOTP) += nvmem-vf610-ocotp.o
> +nvmem-vf610-ocotp-y := vf610-ocotp.o
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/vf610-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/vf610-ocotp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d98772d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/vf610-ocotp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Sanchayan Maity <sanchayan.maity@toradex.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include "nvmem-mmio.h"
> +
> +static struct regmap_config regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 32,
> + .val_bits = 32,
> + .reg_stride = 4,
Any particular reason why it cant support byte reads?
This driver looks exactly same as qcom,qfprom driver, except the
regmap_config.
> +};
> +
> +static struct nvmem_config ocotp_config = {
> + .name = "soc_id",
> +};
> +
> +static struct nvmem_config rom_config = {
> + .name = "rom_rev",
> +};
> +
> +static struct nvmem_mmio_data ocotp_data = {
> + .nvmem_config = &ocotp_config,
> + .regmap_config = ®map_config,
> +};
> +
> +static struct nvmem_mmio_data rom_data = {
> + .nvmem_config = &rom_config,
> + .regmap_config = ®map_config,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ocotp_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-ocotp", .data = &ocotp_data},
> + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-ocrom", .data = &rom_data},
> + {/* sentinel */},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ocotp_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver vf610_ocotp_driver = {
> + .probe = nvmem_mmio_probe,
> + .remove = nvmem_mmio_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "vf610-nvmem",
> + .of_match_table = ocotp_of_match,
> + },
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(vf610_ocotp_driver);
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sanchayan Maity <sanchayan.maity@toradex.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Vybrid NVMEM driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
I moved the nvmem_mmio to qfprom as I did not any other user for that in
v6 patches.
Now that Vybrid can be another user I should probably put it back, or
may be I should create a simple-mmio-nvmem driver which both qcom,qfprom
and Vybrid can use.
--srini
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 13:44 [RFC PATCH v6 0/2] Implement NVMEM/SoC bus support for Vybrid Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-23 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/2] ARM: dts: vfxxx: Add OCOTP and OCROM nodes Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-23 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP and OCROM support Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-23 19:03 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2015-06-24 5:25 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-06-23 19:31 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-06-24 5:19 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-06-24 9:37 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-06-24 9:44 ` Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-24 9:56 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-06-24 10:45 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-06-24 11:52 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-06-24 12:05 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-06-29 11:22 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/3] Implement NVMEM/SoC bus support for Vybrid Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-29 11:22 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/3] clk: clk-vf610: Add clock for Vybrid OCOTP controller Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-29 11:22 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/3] ARM: dts: vfxxx: Add OCOTP node Sanchayan Maity
2015-06-29 11:22 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/3] drivers: nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP support Sanchayan Maity
2015-07-06 10:16 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-07-07 5:19 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-07-07 12:49 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-07-08 5:39 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-07-08 20:55 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-07-10 18:09 ` maitysanchayan at gmail.com
2015-06-24 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP and OCROM support Stefan Agner
2015-06-24 8:35 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-06-24 9:34 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-06-25 17:49 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5589AD83.8050704@linaro.org \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).