From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tremyfr@gmail.com (Philippe Reynes)
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 22:38:11 +0200
Subject: imx: apf27: the board no longer boot with latest git kernel
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5DgrV-divVoAa3K5QOLdxChewpGcKRLbDjMPRtpx_8KNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <558EA370.6020108@gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5AcRd8UJQg9MpV6mXJKkB2JMriGHzzKYS95oWQYzMOsuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <558EDCB2.9040603@gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5DbL8etNQAb4vOwsXSQr2SBWMzCx0P7+TUWj54T9ZrSjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5DgrV-divVoAa3K5QOLdxChewpGcKRLbDjMPRtpx_8KNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <558F09B3.9050907@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Fabio,

On 27/06/15 21:17, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Philippe,
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Fabio Estevam<festevam@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Yes, please submit a formal patch.
>>
>> I thought it was imx1_timer_init_dt because in imx27.dtsi we have:
>>
>> compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
>>
>> So I am wondering if this is correct or it should be
>>
>> compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt"; instead?
>
> In addition to the drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c patch, could
> you also try the change below?

Yes, I do it
  
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
>               };
>
>               gpt1: timer at 10003000 {
> -                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
> +                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
>                   reg =<0x10003000 0x1000>;
>                   interrupts =<26>;
>                   clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT1_IPG_GATE>,
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
>               };
>
>               gpt2: timer at 10004000 {
> -                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
> +                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
>                   reg =<0x10004000 0x1000>;
>                   interrupts =<25>;
>                   clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT2_IPG_GATE>,
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
>               };
>
>               gpt3: timer at 10005000 {
> -                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
> +                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
>                   reg =<0x10005000 0x1000>;
>                   interrupts =<24>;
>                   clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT3_IPG_GATE>,
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@
>               };
>
>               gpt4: timer at 10019000 {
> -                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
> +                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
>                   reg =<0x10019000 0x1000>;
>                   interrupts =<4>;
>                   clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT4_IPG_GATE>,
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
>               };
>
>               gpt5: timer at 1001a000 {
> -                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
> +                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
>                   reg =<0x1001a000 0x1000>;
>                   interrupts =<3>;
>                   clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT5_IPG_GATE>,
> @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
>               };
>
>               gpt6: timer at 1001f000 {
> -                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
> +                compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
>                   reg =<0x1001f000 0x1000>;
>                   interrupts =<2>;
>                   clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT6_IPG_GATE>,

I've tested this change, and it works fine.
In the file drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c, there is :
#define imx21_gpt_irq_disable imx1_gpt_irq_disable
#define imx21_gpt_irq_enable imx1_gpt_irq_enable
So I think that using imx1 or imx21 has the same result;

Do you think I should put both change in on patch ?
Or is it better to do two patches please ?

Regards,
Philippe