From: thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (leizhen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu: suppress fault information about CMD_PREFETCH_CONFIG execution
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:18:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55925EE5.9080105@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150629174909.GN17474@arm.com>
On 2015/6/30 1:49, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:33:04AM +0100, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Some broken SMMUv3 devices treat CMD_PREFETCH_CONFIG as illegal command,
>> it's ugly to print error information. CMD_PREFETCH_CONFIG is just used to
>> prefetch the configuration for a specified StreamID, without this command
>> will not impact SMMUv3 function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> index d799feb..3971aef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_skip_err(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> };
>>
>> int i;
>> + u32 opcode;
>> u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
>> struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q;
>> u32 cons = readl_relaxed(q->cons_reg);
>> @@ -821,15 +822,14 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_skip_err(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC,
>> };
>>
>> - dev_err(smmu->dev, "CMDQ error (cons 0x%08x): %s\n", cons,
>> - cerror_str[idx]);
>> -
>> switch (idx) {
>> case CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_ILL_IDX:
>> break;
>> case CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_ABT_IDX:
>> - dev_err(smmu->dev, "retrying command fetch\n");
>> case CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_NONE_IDX:
>> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "CMDQ error (cons 0x%08x): %s\n", cons,
>> + cerror_str[idx]);
>> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "retrying command execution\n");
>
> Why are you making this (unrelated) change?
>
> Out of interest, did the gerror code manage to turn the prefetch into
> a SYNC, as intended?
Yes, It worked fine. The program can continue to run normally, that's why I don't want to
print these error information. Because this problem is known on my platform, and can sliently
ignored.
>
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -838,10 +838,20 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_skip_err(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> * not to touch any of the shadow cmdq state.
>> */
>> queue_read(cmd, Q_ENT(q, idx), q->ent_dwords);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Some broken SMMUv3 devices treat CMD_PREFETCH_CONFIG as illegal
>> + * command, it's ugly to print error information.
>> + */
>> + opcode = (cmd[0] >> CMDQ_0_OP_SHIFT) & CMDQ_0_OP_MASK;
>> + if (opcode == CMDQ_OP_PREFETCH_CFG)
>> + goto skip_error_command;
>> +
>
> I think a better way to fix this would be to add a quick to the device-tree
> along the lines of "hisilicon,broken-prefetch-cmd" which we could check
> before issuing the prefetch command in arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent.
>
> Something along the lines of the arm_smmu_options in arm-smmu.c would be
> a good basis for quirks.
It's a good idea. I known the arm_smmu_options, I will rewrite this patch in V2.
>
> Will
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-26 8:32 [PATCH 0/8] iommu/arm-smmu: bugfixs and add support for non-pci devices Zhen Lei
2015-06-26 8:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the assignment of log2size field Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:05 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 3:47 ` leizhen
2015-06-26 8:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the index calculation of strtab Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:17 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-26 8:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the values of ARM64_TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT and ARM64_TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:25 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 3:57 ` leizhen
2015-06-30 14:11 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-26 8:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu: set EPD1 to disable TT1 translation table walk Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:26 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 4:40 ` leizhen
2015-06-26 8:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu: rename __arm_smmu_get_pci_sid Zhen Lei
2015-06-26 8:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for non-pci devices Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:28 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 8:51 ` leizhen
2015-06-30 11:26 ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-01 2:16 ` leizhen
2015-06-26 8:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: enlarge STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT to support larger sidsize Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:35 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 8:57 ` leizhen
2015-06-26 8:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu: suppress fault information about CMD_PREFETCH_CONFIG execution Zhen Lei
2015-06-29 17:49 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 9:18 ` leizhen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55925EE5.9080105@huawei.com \
--to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).