linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:58:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5592A076.8090603@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150630135153.GJ27725@arm.com>

Will Deacon wrote:
> Well, it's up to you to figure out the details, but I'd start by adding
> some static inlines to the arch-specific header files for enabling/disabling
> userspace access.
>
>  From there, I think I'd get the architecture init code to reset the thing
> to "disabled" (so it's disabled regardless of whether we build the hvc_dcc
> driver) and then if you wanted to go all-out, we could have a sysfs entry
> provided by the driver to toggle it on and off.
>
>> >static int __init hvc_dcc_console_init(void)
>> >{
>> >#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>> >	u32 val;
>> >
>> >	asm("msr mdscr_el1, %0	"
>> >	"orr %0, %0, #4096	" /* TDCC */
>> >	"msr %0, mdscr_el1	"
>> >	: "=r" (val));
>> >#endif
>> >
>> >But this seems clunky.
> Yeah, that's super ugly.
>
>> >I am concerned about KVM, though.  There appears to be code in KVM in
>> >hyp.s and sys_regs.c that touches and/or emulates MDSCR_EL1.
>> >
>> >On a side note, it does not appear that ARM32 blocks userspace DCC.  I
>> >don't see where DBGDSCR.UDCCdis is set.
> That's a bug imo.

So wouldn't it be more appropriate to have a separate patch that handles 
disabling of user-space DCC for ARM32 and ARM64?  All I really want to 
do at this point is provide basic DCC support for ARM64, just like we 
have for ARM32.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-30 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-19 22:08 [PATCH] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc Timur Tabi
2015-06-22 13:12 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-22 13:16   ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-24 20:11   ` Timur Tabi
2015-06-30 13:51     ` Will Deacon
2015-06-30 13:58       ` Timur Tabi [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-16 22:29 Abhimanyu Kapur
2014-06-17  9:51 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-05 18:35   ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5592A076.8090603@codeaurora.org \
    --to=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).