From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:27:17 +0200 Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control In-Reply-To: <1436184692-20927-4-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> References: <1436184692-20927-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1436184692-20927-4-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> Message-ID: <559A7425.4050506@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/07/2015 14:11, Eric Auger wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/irq/bypass.c b/kernel/irq/bypass.c > index 5d0f92b..efadbe5 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/bypass.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/bypass.c > @@ -19,6 +19,42 @@ static LIST_HEAD(producers); > static LIST_HEAD(consumers); > static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock); > > +/* lock must be hold when calling connect */ If a lock must be held while callbacks are called, you have to document that producers and consumers must _not_ call back into the IRQ bypass manager. (If they have to, you have to document explicitly "This function can be called from producer and consumer callbacks" whenever relevant). > +static void connect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod, > + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) > +{ > + if (prod->stop) > + prod->stop(prod); > + if (cons->stop) > + cons->stop(cons); > + if (prod->add_consumer) > + prod->add_consumer(prod, cons); > + if (cons->add_producer) > + cons->add_producer(cons, prod); > + if (cons->resume) > + cons->resume(cons); > + if (prod->resume) > + prod->resume(prod); > +} > + > +/* lock must be hold when calling disconnect */ > +static void disconnect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod, > + struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) > +{ > + if (prod->stop) > + prod->stop(prod); > + if (cons->stop) > + cons->stop(cons); > + if (cons->del_producer) > + cons->del_producer(cons, prod); > + if (prod->del_consumer) > + prod->del_consumer(prod, cons); > + if (cons->resume) > + cons->resume(cons); > + if (prod->resume) > + prod->resume(prod); > +} > +