linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:00:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559BB167.1030603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0025F342B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>



On 07/07/2015 12:58, Wu, Feng wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger at linaro.org]
>> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:11 PM
>> To: eric.auger at st.com; eric.auger at linaro.org;
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu;
>> kvm at vger.kernel.org; christoffer.dall at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com;
>> alex.williamson at redhat.com; pbonzini at redhat.com; avi.kivity at gmail.com;
>> mtosatti at redhat.com; Wu, Feng; joro at 8bytes.org;
>> b.reynal at virtualopensystems.com
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; patches at linaro.org
>> Subject: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control
>>
>> - [add,del]_[consumer,producer] updated to takes both the consumer and
>>   producer handles. This is requested to combine info from both,
>>   typically to link the source irq owned by the producer with the gsi
>>   owned by the consumer (forwarded IRQ setup).
>> - new methods are added:
>>   x stop/resume: Those are needed for forwarding since the state change
>>     requires to entermingle actions at consumer, producer.
>>   x consumer update for posted interrupts
>> - On handshake, we now call connect, disconnect which features the more
>>   complex sequence.
>> - add irq on producer side
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - remove vfio_device, kvm, gsi, opaque fields included in v1 except common
>> - all those in can be retrieved with container_of in callbacks
>> ---
>>  include/linux/irqbypass.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>>  kernel/irq/bypass.c       | 44
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqbypass.h b/include/linux/irqbypass.h
>> index 718508e..8f62235 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqbypass.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqbypass.h
>> @@ -3,17 +3,30 @@
>>
>>  #include <linux/list.h>
>>
>> +struct irq_bypass_consumer;
>> +
>>  struct irq_bypass_producer {
>>  	struct list_head node;
>>  	void *token;
>> -	/* TBD */
>> +	int irq; /* linux irq */
>> +	void (*stop)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> +	void (*resume)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> +	void (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
>> +			     struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
>> +	void (*del_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
>> +			     struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
>>  };
>>
>>  struct irq_bypass_consumer {
>>  	struct list_head node;
>>  	void *token;
> 
> Can we add a pointer to ' struct irq_bypass_producer ', and
> assign it when connecting, de-assign it when disconnecting.
> since in some case, I need to update IRTE from the consumer
> side, where I cannot get the related producer info (I need irq info)
> without iterating it again.

You can use container_of to add it to your own struct, e.g.

	struct irq_bypass_consumer cons;
	struct irq_bypass_producer *prod;

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Feng
> 
>> -	void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> -	void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> +	void (*stop)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
>> +	void (*resume)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
>> +	void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *,
>> +			     struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> +	void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *,
>> +			     struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> +	void (*update)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
>>  };
>>
>>  int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/bypass.c b/kernel/irq/bypass.c
>> index 5d0f92b..efadbe5 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/bypass.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/bypass.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,42 @@ static LIST_HEAD(producers);
>>  static LIST_HEAD(consumers);
>>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
>>
>> +/* lock must be hold when calling connect */
>> +static void connect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
>> +		    struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
>> +{
>> +	if (prod->stop)
>> +		prod->stop(prod);
>> +	if (cons->stop)
>> +		cons->stop(cons);
>> +	if (prod->add_consumer)
>> +		prod->add_consumer(prod, cons);
>> +	if (cons->add_producer)
>> +		cons->add_producer(cons, prod);
>> +	if (cons->resume)
>> +		cons->resume(cons);
>> +	if (prod->resume)
>> +		prod->resume(prod);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* lock must be hold when calling disconnect */
>> +static void disconnect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
>> +		       struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
>> +{
>> +	if (prod->stop)
>> +		prod->stop(prod);
>> +	if (cons->stop)
>> +		cons->stop(cons);
>> +	if (cons->del_producer)
>> +		cons->del_producer(cons, prod);
>> +	if (prod->del_consumer)
>> +		prod->del_consumer(prod, cons);
>> +	if (cons->resume)
>> +		cons->resume(cons);
>> +	if (prod->resume)
>> +		prod->resume(prod);
>> +}
>> +
>>  int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>>  {
>>  	struct irq_bypass_producer *tmp;
>> @@ -38,7 +74,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_producer(struct
>> irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>>
>>  	list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) {
>>  		if (consumer->token == producer->token) {
>> -			consumer->add_producer(producer);
>> +			connect(producer, consumer);
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> @@ -56,7 +92,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_producer(struct
>> irq_bypass_producer *producer)
>>
>>  	list_for_each_entry(consumer, &consumers, node) {
>>  		if (consumer->token == producer->token) {
>> -			consumer->del_producer(producer);
>> +			disconnect(producer, consumer);
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> @@ -86,7 +122,7 @@ int irq_bypass_register_consumer(struct
>> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>>
>>  	list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) {
>>  		if (producer->token == consumer->token) {
>> -			consumer->add_producer(producer);
>> +			connect(producer, consumer);
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> @@ -104,7 +140,7 @@ void irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(struct
>> irq_bypass_consumer *consumer)
>>
>>  	list_for_each_entry(producer, &producers, node) {
>>  		if (producer->token == consumer->token) {
>> -			consumer->del_producer(producer);
>> +			disconnect(producer, consumer);
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> --
>> 1.9.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-07 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-06 12:11 [RFC v2 0/6] IRQ bypass manager and irqfd consumer Eric Auger
2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 1/6] KVM: arm/arm64: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Eric Auger
2015-07-06 12:24   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 2/6] VFIO: platform: " Eric Auger
2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control Eric Auger
2015-07-06 12:27   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-06 15:35     ` Eric Auger
2015-07-06 15:57       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-06 17:09         ` Eric Auger
2015-07-06 17:41           ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07  7:10             ` Eric Auger
2015-07-07  8:58               ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 10:58   ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07 11:00     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-07 11:13       ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07 11:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 11:18           ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07 11:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 11:24               ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07 11:33                 ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07 13:22                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 4/6] KVM: create kvm_irqfd.h Eric Auger
2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 5/6] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Eric Auger
2015-07-06 12:11 ` [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Eric Auger
2015-07-07  8:47   ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07  9:05     ` Eric Auger
2015-07-07  9:13       ` Wu, Feng
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [RFC v2 0/6] IRQ bypass manager and irqfd consumer Alex Williamson
2015-07-09 12:28   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-09 14:13     ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-09 14:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09 15:34         ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-09 16:06           ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-24  1:27 ` Wu, Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559BB167.1030603@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).