* [PATCH v3 01/15] genirq: irqdomain: Allow irq domain aliasing
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] PCI: MSI: Register irq domain with specific token Marc Zyngier
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
It is not uncommon (at least with the ARM stuff) to have a piece
of hardware that implements different flavours of "interrupts".
A typical example of this is the GICv3 ITS, which implements
standard PCI/MSI support, but also some form of "generic MSI".
So far, the PCI/MSI domain is registered using the ITS device_node,
so that irq_find_host can return it. On the contrary, the raw MSI
domain is not registered with an device_node, making it impossible
to be looked up by another subsystem (obviously, using the same
device_node twice would only result in confusion, as it is not
defined which one irq_find_host would return).
A solution to this is to "type" domains that may be aliasing, and
to be able to lookup an device_node that matches a given type.
For this, we introduce irq_find_matching_host() as a superset
of irq_find_host:
struct irq_domain *irq_find_matching_host(struct device_node *node,
enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token);
where bus_token is the "type" we want to match the domain against
(so far, only DOMAIN_BUS_ANY is defined). This result in some
moderately invasive changes on the PPC side (which is the only
user of the .match method).
This has otherwise no functionnal change.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc5121_ads_cpld.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/flipper-pic.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/xics-common.c | 3 ++-
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
14 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc5121_ads_cpld.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc5121_ads_cpld.c
index ca3a062..11090ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc5121_ads_cpld.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc5121_ads_cpld.c
@@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ cpld_pic_cascade(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
}
static int
-cpld_pic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+cpld_pic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
return cpld_pic_node == node;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c
index 3af8324..a15f1ef 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c
@@ -222,7 +222,8 @@ void iic_request_IPIs(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-static int iic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int iic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
return of_device_is_compatible(node,
"IBM,CBEA-Internal-Interrupt-Controller");
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/flipper-pic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/flipper-pic.c
index 4cde8e7..b7866e0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/flipper-pic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/flipper-pic.c
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ static int flipper_pic_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
return 0;
}
-static int flipper_pic_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *np)
+static int flipper_pic_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *np,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
return 1;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c
index 59cfc9d..6f4f8b0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c
@@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ static struct irqaction gatwick_cascade_action = {
.name = "cascade",
};
-static int pmac_pic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int pmac_pic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
/* We match all, we don't always have a node anyway */
return 1;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
index e2e7d75..2c91ee7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ static void opal_handle_irq_work(struct irq_work *work)
opal_handle_events(be64_to_cpu(last_outstanding_events));
}
-static int opal_event_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int opal_event_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
return h->of_node == node;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c
index a6c42f3..638c406 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c
@@ -678,7 +678,8 @@ static int ps3_host_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
return 0;
}
-static int ps3_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *np)
+static int ps3_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *np,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
/* Match all */
return 1;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
index 2d20f10..eca0b00 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
@@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ unsigned int ehv_pic_get_irq(void)
return irq_linear_revmap(global_ehv_pic->irqhost, irq);
}
-static int ehv_pic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int ehv_pic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
/* Exact match, unless ehv_pic node is NULL */
return h->of_node == NULL || h->of_node == node;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c
index 31c3347..e1a9c2c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ static struct resource pic_edgectrl_iores = {
.flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY,
};
-static int i8259_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int i8259_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
return h->of_node == NULL || h->of_node == node;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
index d78f136..6b2b689 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
@@ -671,7 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_chip ipic_edge_irq_chip = {
.irq_set_type = ipic_set_irq_type,
};
-static int ipic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int ipic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
/* Exact match, unless ipic node is NULL */
return h->of_node == NULL || h->of_node == node;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
index c8e7333..97a8ae8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,8 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_ht_chip = {
#endif /* CONFIG_MPIC_U3_HT_IRQS */
-static int mpic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int mpic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
/* Exact match, unless mpic node is NULL */
return h->of_node == NULL || h->of_node == node;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c
index 6512cd8..47b352e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ static struct irq_chip qe_ic_irq_chip = {
.irq_mask_ack = qe_ic_mask_irq,
};
-static int qe_ic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int qe_ic_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
/* Exact match, unless qe_ic node is NULL */
return h->of_node == NULL || h->of_node == node;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/xics-common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/xics-common.c
index 08c248e..47e43b7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/xics-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/xics-common.c
@@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ int xics_get_irq_server(unsigned int virq, const struct cpumask *cpumask,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-static int xics_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node)
+static int xics_host_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
struct ics *ics;
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 744ac0e..91a83ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -45,6 +45,17 @@ struct irq_data;
/* Number of irqs reserved for a legacy isa controller */
#define NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS 16
+/*
+ * Should several domains have the same device node, but serve
+ * different purposes (for example one domain is for PCI/MSI, and the
+ * other for wired IRQs), they can be distinguished using a
+ * bus-specific token. Most domains are expected to only carry
+ * DOMAIN_BUS_ANY.
+ */
+enum irq_domain_bus_token {
+ DOMAIN_BUS_ANY = 0,
+};
+
/**
* struct irq_domain_ops - Methods for irq_domain objects
* @match: Match an interrupt controller device node to a host, returns
@@ -61,7 +72,8 @@ struct irq_data;
* to setup the irq_desc when returning from map().
*/
struct irq_domain_ops {
- int (*match)(struct irq_domain *d, struct device_node *node);
+ int (*match)(struct irq_domain *d, struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token);
int (*map)(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq, irq_hw_number_t hw);
void (*unmap)(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq);
int (*xlate)(struct irq_domain *d, struct device_node *node,
@@ -116,6 +128,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
/* Optional data */
struct device_node *of_node;
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token;
struct irq_domain_chip_generic *gc;
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
struct irq_domain *parent;
@@ -161,9 +174,15 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_domain_add_legacy(struct device_node *of_node,
irq_hw_number_t first_hwirq,
const struct irq_domain_ops *ops,
void *host_data);
-extern struct irq_domain *irq_find_host(struct device_node *node);
+extern struct irq_domain *irq_find_matching_host(struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token);
extern void irq_set_default_host(struct irq_domain *host);
+static inline struct irq_domain *irq_find_host(struct device_node *node)
+{
+ return irq_find_matching_host(node, DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
+}
+
/**
* irq_domain_add_linear() - Allocate and register a linear revmap irq_domain.
* @of_node: pointer to interrupt controller's device tree node.
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 8c3577f..995d217 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -187,10 +187,12 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_domain_add_legacy(struct device_node *of_node,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_add_legacy);
/**
- * irq_find_host() - Locates a domain for a given device node
+ * irq_find_matching_host() - Locates a domain for a given device node
* @node: device-tree node of the interrupt controller
+ * @data: domain-specific data
*/
-struct irq_domain *irq_find_host(struct device_node *node)
+struct irq_domain *irq_find_matching_host(struct device_node *node,
+ enum irq_domain_bus_token bus_token)
{
struct irq_domain *h, *found = NULL;
int rc;
@@ -199,13 +201,19 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_find_host(struct device_node *node)
* it might potentially be set to match all interrupts in
* the absence of a device node. This isn't a problem so far
* yet though...
+ *
+ * bus_token == DOMAIN_BUS_ANY matches any domain, any other
+ * values must generate an exact match for the domain to be
+ * selected.
*/
mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(h, &irq_domain_list, link) {
if (h->ops->match)
- rc = h->ops->match(h, node);
+ rc = h->ops->match(h, node, bus_token);
else
- rc = (h->of_node != NULL) && (h->of_node == node);
+ rc = ((h->of_node != NULL) && (h->of_node == node) &&
+ ((bus_token == DOMAIN_BUS_ANY) ||
+ (h->bus_token == bus_token)));
if (rc) {
found = h;
@@ -215,7 +223,7 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_find_host(struct device_node *node)
mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
return found;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_find_host);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_find_matching_host);
/**
* irq_set_default_host() - Set a "default" irq domain
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 02/15] PCI: MSI: Register irq domain with specific token
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] genirq: irqdomain: Allow irq domain aliasing Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] device core: Introduce per-device MSI domain pointer Marc Zyngier
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
When creating a PCI/MSI domain, tag it with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI so
that it can be looked-up using irq_find_matching_host().
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 8 +++++++-
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index f66be86..1e55935 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -1269,12 +1269,18 @@ struct irq_domain *pci_msi_create_irq_domain(struct device_node *node,
struct msi_domain_info *info,
struct irq_domain *parent)
{
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+
if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS)
pci_msi_domain_update_dom_ops(info);
if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS)
pci_msi_domain_update_chip_ops(info);
- return msi_create_irq_domain(node, info, parent);
+ domain = msi_create_irq_domain(node, info, parent);
+ if (domain)
+ domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI;
+
+ return domain;
}
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 91a83ad..25e9e66 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct irq_data;
*/
enum irq_domain_bus_token {
DOMAIN_BUS_ANY = 0,
+ DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI,
};
/**
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 03/15] device core: Introduce per-device MSI domain pointer
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] genirq: irqdomain: Allow irq domain aliasing Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] PCI: MSI: Register irq domain with specific token Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] PCI/MSI: Add hooks to populate the msi_domain field Marc Zyngier
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
As MSI-type features are creeping into non-PCI devices, it is
starting to make sense to give our struct device some form of
support for this, by allowing a pointer to an MSI irq domain to
be set/retrieved.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
include/linux/device.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index 5a31bf3..4421f2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -713,6 +713,7 @@ struct device_dma_parameters {
* along with subsystem-level and driver-level callbacks.
* @pins: For device pin management.
* See Documentation/pinctrl.txt for details.
+ * @msi_domain: The generic MSI domain this device is using.
* @numa_node: NUMA node this device is close to.
* @dma_mask: Dma mask (if dma'ble device).
* @coherent_dma_mask: Like dma_mask, but for alloc_coherent mapping as not all
@@ -773,6 +774,9 @@ struct device {
struct dev_pm_info power;
struct dev_pm_domain *pm_domain;
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ struct irq_domain *msi_domain; /* MSI domain device uses */
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL
struct dev_pin_info *pins;
#endif
@@ -860,6 +864,22 @@ static inline void set_dev_node(struct device *dev, int node)
}
#endif
+static inline struct irq_domain *dev_get_msi_domain(const struct device *dev)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ return dev->msi_domain;
+#else
+ return NULL;
+#endif
+}
+
+static inline void dev_set_msi_domain(struct device *dev, struct irq_domain *d)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ dev->msi_domain = d;
+#endif
+}
+
static inline void *dev_get_drvdata(const struct device *dev)
{
return dev->driver_data;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 04/15] PCI/MSI: Add hooks to populate the msi_domain field
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] device core: Introduce per-device MSI domain pointer Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] PCI/MSI: of: Add support for OF-provided msi_domain Marc Zyngier
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
In order to be able to populate the device msi_domain field,
add the necesary hooks to propagate the host bridge msi_domain
across secondary busses to devices.
So far, nobody populates the initial msi_domain.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index cefd636..376f6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -661,6 +661,20 @@ static void pci_set_bus_speed(struct pci_bus *bus)
}
}
+void __weak pcibios_set_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+}
+
+static void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
+
+ if (!bridge)
+ pcibios_set_host_bridge_msi_domain(bus);
+ else
+ dev_set_msi_domain(&bus->dev, dev_get_msi_domain(&bridge->dev));
+}
+
static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
struct pci_dev *bridge, int busnr)
{
@@ -714,6 +728,7 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
bridge->subordinate = child;
add_dev:
+ pci_set_bus_msi_domain(child);
ret = device_register(&child->dev);
WARN_ON(ret < 0);
@@ -1544,6 +1559,17 @@ static void pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_enable_acs(dev);
}
+static void pci_set_msi_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ /*
+ * If no domain has been set through the pcibios callback,
+ * inherit the default from the bus device.
+ */
+ if (!dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev))
+ dev_set_msi_domain(&dev->dev,
+ dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->bus->dev));
+}
+
void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
{
int ret;
@@ -1585,6 +1611,9 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
ret = pcibios_add_device(dev);
WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+ /* Setup MSI irq domain */
+ pci_set_msi_domain(dev);
+
/* Notifier could use PCI capabilities */
dev->match_driver = false;
ret = device_add(&dev->dev);
@@ -1975,6 +2004,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
b->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev);
device_enable_async_suspend(b->bridge);
pci_set_bus_of_node(b);
+ pci_set_bus_msi_domain(b);
if (!parent)
set_dev_node(b->bridge, pcibus_to_node(b));
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 8a0321a..3622453 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1645,6 +1645,7 @@ int pcibios_set_pcie_reset_state(struct pci_dev *dev,
int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
void pcibios_release_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
+void pcibios_set_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus);
#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
extern struct dev_pm_ops pcibios_pm_ops;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 05/15] PCI/MSI: of: Add support for OF-provided msi_domain
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] PCI/MSI: Add hooks to populate the msi_domain field Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] PCI/MSI: of: Allow msi_domain lookup using the host bridge node Marc Zyngier
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
In order to populate the PHB msi_domain, use the "msi-parent"
attribute to lookup a corresponding irq domain. If found,
this is our MSI domain.
This gets plugged into the core PCI code.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/of.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pci/probe.c | 1 +
include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
index f092993..09df465 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/of.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*/
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
@@ -59,3 +60,21 @@ struct device_node * __weak pcibios_get_phb_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus)
return of_node_get(bus->bridge->parent->of_node);
return NULL;
}
+
+void pci_set_phb_of_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ struct device_node *np;
+ struct irq_domain *d;
+
+ if (!bus->dev.of_node)
+ return;
+ np = of_parse_phandle(bus->dev.of_node, "msi-parent", 0);
+ if (!np)
+ return;
+ d = irq_find_matching_host(np, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
+ if (!d)
+ d = irq_find_host(np);
+ dev_set_msi_domain(&bus->dev, d);
+#endif
+}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 376f6fa..c80626f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -663,6 +663,7 @@ static void pci_set_bus_speed(struct pci_bus *bus)
void __weak pcibios_set_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
+ pci_set_phb_of_msi_domain(bus);
}
static void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 3622453..ee3cdba 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ void pci_set_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev);
void pci_release_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev);
void pci_set_bus_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus);
void pci_release_bus_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus);
+void pci_set_phb_of_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus);
/* Arch may override this (weak) */
struct device_node *pcibios_get_phb_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus);
@@ -1869,6 +1870,7 @@ static inline void pci_set_bus_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
static inline void pci_release_bus_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
static inline struct device_node *
pci_device_to_OF_node(const struct pci_dev *pdev) { return NULL; }
+static inline void pci_set_phb_of_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 06/15] PCI/MSI: of: Allow msi_domain lookup using the host bridge node
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] PCI/MSI: of: Add support for OF-provided msi_domain Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct device's msi_domain Marc Zyngier
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
A number of platforms do not need to use the msi-parent property,
as the host bridge itself provides the MSI controller.
Allow this configuration by performing an irq domain lookup based
on the host bridge node if it doesn't have a valid msi-parent property.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/of.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
index 09df465..9d61cef 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/of.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
@@ -69,9 +69,14 @@ void pci_set_phb_of_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
if (!bus->dev.of_node)
return;
+ /* Start looking for a phandle to an MSI controller. */
np = of_parse_phandle(bus->dev.of_node, "msi-parent", 0);
+ /*
+ * If we don't have an msi-parent property, look for a domain
+ * directly attached to the host bridge.
+ */
if (!np)
- return;
+ np = bus->dev.of_node;
d = irq_find_matching_host(np, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
if (!d)
d = irq_find_host(np);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 07/15] PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct device's msi_domain
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] PCI/MSI: of: Allow msi_domain lookup using the host bridge node Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] platform: of: Assign MSI domain to platform device Marc Zyngier
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Now that we can easily find which MSI domain a PCI device is
using, use dev_get_msi_domain as a way to retrieve the information.
The original code is still used as a fallback.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 1e55935..5ffc340 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_msi_get_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
- if (dev->bus->msi)
+ domain = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
+ if (!domain && dev->bus->msi)
domain = dev->bus->msi->domain;
if (!domain)
domain = arch_get_pci_msi_domain(dev);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 08/15] platform: of: Assign MSI domain to platform device
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct device's msi_domain Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver Marc Zyngier
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
As for PCI, we're able to populate the msi_domain field at probe time,
provided that the device tree has an "msi-parent" property.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/of/irq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/of/platform.c | 1 +
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 1 +
include/linux/of_irq.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
index 3cf7a01..64392a6 100644
--- a/drivers/of/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
* driver.
*/
+#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -576,3 +577,18 @@ err:
kfree(desc);
}
}
+
+void of_msi_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct device_node *msi_np;
+ struct irq_domain *d;
+
+ msi_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "msi-parent", 0);
+ if (!msi_np)
+ return;
+
+ d = irq_find_matching_host(msi_np, DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI);
+ if (!d)
+ d = irq_find_host(msi_np);
+ dev_set_msi_domain(dev, d);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index ddf8e42..8a002d6 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ static struct platform_device *of_platform_device_create_pdata(
dev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type;
dev->dev.platform_data = platform_data;
of_dma_configure(&dev->dev, dev->dev.of_node);
+ of_msi_configure(&dev->dev, dev->dev.of_node);
if (of_device_add(dev) != 0) {
of_dma_deconfigure(&dev->dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 25e9e66..b4a74f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct irq_data;
enum irq_domain_bus_token {
DOMAIN_BUS_ANY = 0,
DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI,
+ DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI,
};
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/of_irq.h b/include/linux/of_irq.h
index d884929..4bcbd58 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_irq.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static inline int of_irq_to_resource_table(struct device_node *dev,
*/
extern unsigned int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index);
extern struct device_node *of_irq_find_parent(struct device_node *child);
+extern void of_msi_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np);
#else /* !CONFIG_OF */
static inline unsigned int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *dev,
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 09/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] platform: of: Assign MSI domain to platform device Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-08 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Register irq domain with platform MSI token Marc Zyngier
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
It is becoming obvious that having the PCI/MSI code in the same
file as the the core ITS code is giving people implementing non-PCI
MSI support the wrong kind of idea.
In order to make things a bit clearer, let's move the PCI/MSI code
out to its own file. Hopefully it will make it clear that whoever
thinks of hooking into the core ITS better have a very strong point.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 93 ++++-----------------------
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 6 ++
4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
index b8d4e96..0d5f2a9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SPEAR3XX) += spear-shirq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC) += irq-gic.o irq-gic-common.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V2M) += irq-gic-v2m.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3) += irq-gic-v3.o irq-gic-common.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) += irq-gic-v3-its.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) += irq-gic-v3-its.o irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_NVIC) += irq-nvic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VIC) += irq-vic.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ATMEL_AIC_IRQ) += irq-atmel-aic-common.o irq-atmel-aic.o
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7614721
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2013-2015 ARM Limited, All Rights Reserved.
+ * Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/msi.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/of_pci.h>
+
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
+
+static void its_mask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
+ irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void its_unmask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
+ irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip its_msi_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "ITS-MSI",
+ .irq_unmask = its_unmask_msi_irq,
+ .irq_mask = its_mask_msi_irq,
+ .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
+ .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg,
+};
+
+struct its_pci_alias {
+ struct pci_dev *pdev;
+ u32 dev_id;
+ u32 count;
+};
+
+static int its_pci_msi_vec_count(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ int msi, msix;
+
+ msi = max(pci_msi_vec_count(pdev), 0);
+ msix = max(pci_msix_vec_count(pdev), 0);
+
+ return max(msi, msix);
+}
+
+static int its_get_pci_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
+{
+ struct its_pci_alias *dev_alias = data;
+
+ dev_alias->dev_id = alias;
+ if (pdev != dev_alias->pdev)
+ dev_alias->count += its_pci_msi_vec_count(dev_alias->pdev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int its_pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
+ int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev;
+ struct its_pci_alias dev_alias;
+
+ if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+ dev_alias.pdev = pdev;
+ dev_alias.count = nvec;
+
+ pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, its_get_pci_alias, &dev_alias);
+
+ return its_msi_prepare(domain, dev_alias.dev_id, dev_alias.count, info);
+}
+
+static struct msi_domain_ops its_pci_msi_ops = {
+ .msi_prepare = its_pci_msi_prepare,
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_info its_pci_msi_domain_info = {
+ .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
+ MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
+ .ops = &its_pci_msi_ops,
+ .chip = &its_msi_irq_chip,
+};
+
+struct irq_domain *its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(struct device_node *np,
+ struct irq_domain *parent)
+{
+ return pci_msi_create_irq_domain(np, &its_pci_msi_domain_info, parent);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 1b7e155..7c01fe4 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -611,26 +611,6 @@ static struct irq_chip its_irq_chip = {
.irq_compose_msi_msg = its_irq_compose_msi_msg,
};
-static void its_mask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
-{
- pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
- irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
-}
-
-static void its_unmask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
-{
- pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
- irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
-}
-
-static struct irq_chip its_msi_irq_chip = {
- .name = "ITS-MSI",
- .irq_unmask = its_unmask_msi_irq,
- .irq_mask = its_mask_msi_irq,
- .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
- .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg,
-};
-
/*
* How we allocate LPIs:
*
@@ -1173,85 +1153,34 @@ static int its_alloc_device_irq(struct its_device *dev, irq_hw_number_t *hwirq)
return 0;
}
-struct its_pci_alias {
- struct pci_dev *pdev;
- u32 dev_id;
- u32 count;
-};
-
-static int its_pci_msi_vec_count(struct pci_dev *pdev)
-{
- int msi, msix;
-
- msi = max(pci_msi_vec_count(pdev), 0);
- msix = max(pci_msix_vec_count(pdev), 0);
-
- return max(msi, msix);
-}
-
-static int its_get_pci_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
+int its_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, u32 dev_id,
+ int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
{
- struct its_pci_alias *dev_alias = data;
-
- dev_alias->dev_id = alias;
- if (pdev != dev_alias->pdev)
- dev_alias->count += its_pci_msi_vec_count(dev_alias->pdev);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int its_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
- int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
-{
- struct pci_dev *pdev;
struct its_node *its;
struct its_device *its_dev;
- struct its_pci_alias dev_alias;
-
- if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
- dev_alias.pdev = pdev;
- dev_alias.count = nvec;
- pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, its_get_pci_alias, &dev_alias);
its = domain->parent->host_data;
-
- its_dev = its_find_device(its, dev_alias.dev_id);
+ its_dev = its_find_device(its, dev_id);
if (its_dev) {
/*
* We already have seen this ID, probably through
* another alias (PCI bridge of some sort). No need to
* create the device.
*/
- dev_dbg(dev, "Reusing ITT for devID %x\n", dev_alias.dev_id);
+ pr_debug("Reusing ITT for devID %x\n", dev_id);
goto out;
}
- its_dev = its_create_device(its, dev_alias.dev_id, dev_alias.count);
+ its_dev = its_create_device(its, dev_id, nvec);
if (!its_dev)
return -ENOMEM;
- dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "ITT %d entries, %d bits\n",
- dev_alias.count, ilog2(dev_alias.count));
+ pr_debug("ITT %d entries, %d bits\n", nvec, ilog2(nvec));
out:
info->scratchpad[0].ptr = its_dev;
- info->scratchpad[1].ptr = dev;
return 0;
}
-static struct msi_domain_ops its_pci_msi_ops = {
- .msi_prepare = its_msi_prepare,
-};
-
-static struct msi_domain_info its_pci_msi_domain_info = {
- .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
- MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
- .ops = &its_pci_msi_ops,
- .chip = &its_msi_irq_chip,
-};
-
static int its_irq_gic_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
unsigned int virq,
irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
@@ -1287,8 +1216,9 @@ static int its_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i,
hwirq, &its_irq_chip, its_dev);
- dev_dbg(info->scratchpad[1].ptr, "ID:%d pID:%d vID:%d\n",
- (int)(hwirq - its_dev->lpi_base), (int)hwirq, virq + i);
+ pr_debug("ID:%d pID:%d vID:%d\n",
+ (int)(hwirq - its_dev->lpi_base),
+ (int)hwirq, virq + i);
}
return 0;
@@ -1485,9 +1415,8 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
its->domain->parent = parent;
- its->msi_chip.domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(node,
- &its_pci_msi_domain_info,
- its->domain);
+ its->msi_chip.domain = its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(node,
+ its->domain);
if (!its->msi_chip.domain) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_domains;
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
index ffbc034..d6149ba 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
@@ -360,6 +360,7 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <asm/msi.h>
/*
* We need a value to serve as a irq-type for LPIs. Choose one that will
@@ -388,6 +389,11 @@ struct irq_domain;
int its_cpu_init(void);
int its_init(struct device_node *node, struct rdists *rdists,
struct irq_domain *domain);
+int its_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, u32 dev_id,
+ int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info);
+
+struct irq_domain *its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(struct device_node *node,
+ struct irq_domain *parent);
#endif
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 09/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-08 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-08 11:02 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2015-07-08 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +static int its_pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> + int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + struct its_pci_alias dev_alias;
> +
> + if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> + dev_alias.pdev = pdev;
> + dev_alias.count = nvec;
> +
> + pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, its_get_pci_alias, &dev_alias);
> +
> + return its_msi_prepare(domain, dev_alias.dev_id, dev_alias.count, info);
I don't think you need its_msi_prepare() exposed to child
drivers. Something like
domain->parent->ops->msi_prepare()
should do the trick.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 09/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver
2015-07-08 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2015-07-08 11:02 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-08 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 08/07/15 11:48, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> +static int its_pci_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
>> + int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
>> + struct its_pci_alias dev_alias;
>> +
>> + if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> + dev_alias.pdev = pdev;
>> + dev_alias.count = nvec;
>> +
>> + pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, its_get_pci_alias, &dev_alias);
>> +
>> + return its_msi_prepare(domain, dev_alias.dev_id, dev_alias.count, info);
>
> I don't think you need its_msi_prepare() exposed to child
> drivers. Something like
>
> domain->parent->ops->msi_prepare()
>
> should do the trick.
Good point.
I've so far conveniently avoided having an extra set of msi_domain_ops
at the ITS level itself, but that is starting to look like a mistake.
I'll work something out.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 10/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Register irq domain with platform MSI token
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] irqchip: GICv2m: Get rid of struct msi_controller Marc Zyngier
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Now that we can distinguish between multiple domains carrying the
same device_node, tag the raw ITS domain with DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 7c01fe4..140224c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -1407,13 +1407,14 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
writel_relaxed(GITS_CTLR_ENABLE, its->base + GITS_CTLR);
if (of_property_read_bool(its->msi_chip.of_node, "msi-controller")) {
- its->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(NULL, &its_domain_ops, its);
+ its->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &its_domain_ops, its);
if (!its->domain) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_tables;
}
its->domain->parent = parent;
+ its->domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI;
its->msi_chip.domain = its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(node,
its->domain);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 11/15] irqchip: GICv2m: Get rid of struct msi_controller
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Register irq domain with platform MSI token Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: " Marc Zyngier
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
GICv2m only uses the msi_controller structure as a way to match
the host bridge with its MSI HW, and thus the msi_domain.
But now that we can directly associate an msi_domain with a device,
there is no use keeping this msi_controller around.
Just remove all traces of msi_controller from the driver. Also
tag the inner (non-PCI) domain with DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
index fdf7065..bf5082d4 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@
struct v2m_data {
spinlock_t msi_cnt_lock;
- struct msi_controller mchip;
struct resource res; /* GICv2m resource */
void __iomem *base; /* GICv2m virt address */
u32 spi_start; /* The SPI number that MSIs start */
@@ -218,6 +217,7 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct device_node *node,
{
int ret;
struct v2m_data *v2m;
+ struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
v2m = kzalloc(sizeof(struct v2m_data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!v2m) {
@@ -261,19 +261,18 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct device_node *node,
goto err_iounmap;
}
- v2m->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(NULL, &gicv2m_domain_ops, v2m);
- if (!v2m->domain) {
+ inner_domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &gicv2m_domain_ops, v2m);
+ if (!inner_domain) {
pr_err("Failed to create GICv2m domain\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_bm;
}
- v2m->domain->parent = parent;
- v2m->mchip.of_node = node;
- v2m->mchip.domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(node,
- &gicv2m_msi_domain_info,
- v2m->domain);
- if (!v2m->mchip.domain) {
+ inner_domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI;
+ inner_domain->parent = parent;
+ v2m->domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(node, &gicv2m_msi_domain_info,
+ inner_domain);
+ if (!v2m->domain) {
pr_err("Failed to create MSI domain\n");
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free_domains;
@@ -281,12 +280,6 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct device_node *node,
spin_lock_init(&v2m->msi_cnt_lock);
- ret = of_pci_msi_chip_add(&v2m->mchip);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("Failed to add msi_chip.\n");
- goto err_free_domains;
- }
-
pr_info("Node %s: range[%#lx:%#lx], SPI[%d:%d]\n", node->name,
(unsigned long)v2m->res.start, (unsigned long)v2m->res.end,
v2m->spi_start, (v2m->spi_start + v2m->nr_spis));
@@ -294,10 +287,10 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct device_node *node,
return 0;
err_free_domains:
- if (v2m->mchip.domain)
- irq_domain_remove(v2m->mchip.domain);
if (v2m->domain)
irq_domain_remove(v2m->domain);
+ if (inner_domain)
+ irq_domain_remove(inner_domain);
err_free_bm:
kfree(v2m->bm);
err_iounmap:
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 12/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Get rid of struct msi_controller
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] irqchip: GICv2m: Get rid of struct msi_controller Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Make the PCI/MSI code standalone Marc Zyngier
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The GICv3 ITS only uses the msi_controller structure as a way
to match the PHB with its MSI HW, and thus the msi_domain.
But now that we can directly associate an msi_domain with a device,
there is no use keeping this msi_controller around.
Just remove all traces of msi_controller from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 140224c..c0b574e 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -54,13 +54,12 @@ struct its_collection {
/*
* The ITS structure - contains most of the infrastructure, with the
- * msi_controller, the command queue, the collections, and the list of
- * devices writing to it.
+ * top-level MSI domain, the command queue, the collections, and the
+ * list of devices writing to it.
*/
struct its_node {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head entry;
- struct msi_controller msi_chip;
struct irq_domain *domain;
void __iomem *base;
unsigned long phys_base;
@@ -776,7 +775,7 @@ static void its_free_tables(struct its_node *its)
}
}
-static int its_alloc_tables(struct its_node *its)
+static int its_alloc_tables(const char *node_name, struct its_node *its)
{
int err;
int i;
@@ -819,7 +818,7 @@ static int its_alloc_tables(struct its_node *its)
if (order >= MAX_ORDER) {
order = MAX_ORDER - 1;
pr_warn("%s: Device Table too large, reduce its page order to %u\n",
- its->msi_chip.of_node->full_name, order);
+ node_name, order);
}
}
@@ -889,7 +888,7 @@ retry_baser:
if (val != tmp) {
pr_err("ITS: %s: GITS_BASER%d doesn't stick: %lx %lx\n",
- its->msi_chip.of_node->full_name, i,
+ node_name, i,
(unsigned long) val, (unsigned long) tmp);
err = -ENXIO;
goto out_free;
@@ -1317,6 +1316,7 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
struct resource res;
struct its_node *its;
void __iomem *its_base;
+ struct irq_domain *inner_domain = NULL;
u32 val;
u64 baser, tmp;
int err;
@@ -1360,7 +1360,6 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&its->its_device_list);
its->base = its_base;
its->phys_base = res.start;
- its->msi_chip.of_node = node;
its->ite_size = ((readl_relaxed(its_base + GITS_TYPER) >> 4) & 0xf) + 1;
its->cmd_base = kzalloc(ITS_CMD_QUEUE_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1370,7 +1369,7 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
}
its->cmd_write = its->cmd_base;
- err = its_alloc_tables(its);
+ err = its_alloc_tables(node->full_name, its);
if (err)
goto out_free_cmd;
@@ -1406,26 +1405,21 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
writeq_relaxed(0, its->base + GITS_CWRITER);
writel_relaxed(GITS_CTLR_ENABLE, its->base + GITS_CTLR);
- if (of_property_read_bool(its->msi_chip.of_node, "msi-controller")) {
- its->domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &its_domain_ops, its);
- if (!its->domain) {
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "msi-controller")) {
+ inner_domain = irq_domain_add_tree(node, &its_domain_ops, its);
+ if (!inner_domain) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_tables;
}
- its->domain->parent = parent;
- its->domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI;
+ inner_domain->parent = parent;
+ inner_domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI;
- its->msi_chip.domain = its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(node,
- its->domain);
- if (!its->msi_chip.domain) {
+ its->domain = its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(node, inner_domain);
+ if (!its->domain) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_domains;
}
-
- err = of_pci_msi_chip_add(&its->msi_chip);
- if (err)
- goto out_free_domains;
}
spin_lock(&its_lock);
@@ -1435,10 +1429,10 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
return 0;
out_free_domains:
- if (its->msi_chip.domain)
- irq_domain_remove(its->msi_chip.domain);
if (its->domain)
irq_domain_remove(its->domain);
+ if (inner_domain)
+ irq_domain_remove(inner_domain);
out_free_tables:
its_free_tables(its);
out_free_cmd:
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 13/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Make the PCI/MSI code standalone
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: " Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller Marc Zyngier
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
We can now lookup the base ITS domain, making it possible to
initialize the PCI/MSI code independently from the main ITS
subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 14 +------------
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 3 ---
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
index 7614721..4de130ac 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
@@ -98,8 +98,38 @@ static struct msi_domain_info its_pci_msi_domain_info = {
.chip = &its_msi_irq_chip,
};
-struct irq_domain *its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(struct device_node *np,
- struct irq_domain *parent)
+static struct of_device_id its_device_id[] = {
+ { .compatible = "arm,gic-v3-its", },
+ {},
+};
+
+static int __init its_pci_msi_init(void)
{
- return pci_msi_create_irq_domain(np, &its_pci_msi_domain_info, parent);
+ struct device_node *np;
+ struct irq_domain *parent;
+
+ for (np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, its_device_id); np;
+ np = of_find_matching_node(np, its_device_id)) {
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "msi-controller"))
+ continue;
+
+ parent = irq_find_matching_host(np, DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI);
+ if (!parent) {
+ pr_err("%s: unable to locate ITS domain\n",
+ np->full_name);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (!pci_msi_create_irq_domain(np, &its_pci_msi_domain_info,
+ parent)) {
+ pr_err("%s: unable to create PCI domain\n",
+ np->full_name);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ pr_info("PCI/MSI: %s domain created\n", np->full_name);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
+subsys_initcall(its_pci_msi_init);
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index c0b574e..49020da 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ struct its_collection {
struct its_node {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head entry;
- struct irq_domain *domain;
void __iomem *base;
unsigned long phys_base;
struct its_cmd_block *cmd_base;
@@ -1316,7 +1315,7 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
struct resource res;
struct its_node *its;
void __iomem *its_base;
- struct irq_domain *inner_domain = NULL;
+ struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
u32 val;
u64 baser, tmp;
int err;
@@ -1414,12 +1413,6 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
inner_domain->parent = parent;
inner_domain->bus_token = DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI;
-
- its->domain = its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(node, inner_domain);
- if (!its->domain) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_free_domains;
- }
}
spin_lock(&its_lock);
@@ -1428,11 +1421,6 @@ static int its_probe(struct device_node *node, struct irq_domain *parent)
return 0;
-out_free_domains:
- if (its->domain)
- irq_domain_remove(its->domain);
- if (inner_domain)
- irq_domain_remove(inner_domain);
out_free_tables:
its_free_tables(its);
out_free_cmd:
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
index d6149ba..01caef8 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
@@ -392,9 +392,6 @@ int its_init(struct device_node *node, struct rdists *rdists,
int its_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, u32 dev_id,
int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info);
-struct irq_domain *its_pci_msi_alloc_domain(struct device_node *node,
- struct irq_domain *parent);
-
#endif
#endif
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 14/15] PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] irqchip: gicv3-its: Make the PCI/MSI code standalone Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-09 22:12 ` Duc Dang
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] PCI/MSI: Drop domain field from msi_controller Marc Zyngier
2015-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Lorenzo Pieralisi
15 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The XGene MSI driver only uses the msi_controller structure as
a way to match the host bridge with its MSI HW, and thus the
msi_domain.
But now that we can directly associate an msi_domain with a device,
there is no use keeping this msi_controller around.
Just remove all traces of msi_controller from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
index 2d31d4d..ec5a14b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ struct xgene_msi_group {
struct xgene_msi {
struct device_node *node;
- struct msi_controller mchip;
- struct irq_domain *domain;
+ struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
+ struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
u64 msi_addr;
void __iomem *msi_regs;
unsigned long *bitmap;
@@ -252,17 +252,17 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
static int xgene_allocate_domains(struct xgene_msi *msi)
{
- msi->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, NR_MSI_VEC,
- &msi_domain_ops, msi);
- if (!msi->domain)
+ msi->inner_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, NR_MSI_VEC,
+ &msi_domain_ops, msi);
+ if (!msi->inner_domain)
return -ENOMEM;
- msi->mchip.domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(msi->mchip.of_node,
- &xgene_msi_domain_info,
- msi->domain);
+ msi->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(msi->node,
+ &xgene_msi_domain_info,
+ msi->inner_domain);
- if (!msi->mchip.domain) {
- irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+ if (!msi->msi_domain) {
+ irq_domain_remove(msi->inner_domain);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ static int xgene_allocate_domains(struct xgene_msi *msi)
static void xgene_free_domains(struct xgene_msi *msi)
{
- if (msi->mchip.domain)
- irq_domain_remove(msi->mchip.domain);
- if (msi->domain)
- irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
+ if (msi->msi_domain)
+ irq_domain_remove(msi->msi_domain);
+ if (msi->inner_domain)
+ irq_domain_remove(msi->inner_domain);
}
static int xgene_msi_init_allocator(struct xgene_msi *xgene_msi)
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void xgene_msi_isr(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
* CPU0
*/
hw_irq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(hw_irq);
- virq = irq_find_mapping(xgene_msi->domain, hw_irq);
+ virq = irq_find_mapping(xgene_msi->inner_domain, hw_irq);
WARN_ON(!virq);
if (virq != 0)
generic_handle_irq(virq);
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int xgene_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto error;
}
xgene_msi->msi_addr = res->start;
-
+ xgene_msi->node = pdev->dev.of_node;
xgene_msi->num_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
rc = xgene_msi_init_allocator(xgene_msi);
@@ -561,19 +561,10 @@ static int xgene_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
cpu_notifier_register_done();
- xgene_msi->mchip.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
- rc = of_pci_msi_chip_add(&xgene_msi->mchip);
- if (rc) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add MSI controller chip\n");
- goto error_notifier;
- }
-
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "APM X-Gene PCIe MSI driver loaded\n");
return 0;
-error_notifier:
- unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&xgene_msi_cpu_notifier);
error:
xgene_msi_remove(pdev);
return rc;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 14/15] PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-09 22:12 ` Duc Dang
2015-07-10 8:43 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Duc Dang @ 2015-07-09 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
> The XGene MSI driver only uses the msi_controller structure as
> a way to match the host bridge with its MSI HW, and thus the
> msi_domain.
>
> But now that we can directly associate an msi_domain with a device,
> there is no use keeping this msi_controller around.
>
> Just remove all traces of msi_controller from the driver.
>
Thanks, Marc.
I tested this patch set and it works on my APM X-Gene evaluation platform.
The xgene_pcie_msi_enable (in driver/pci/host/pci-xgene.c), which is
used to get msi_controller for X-Gene PCIe port,
also becomes unnecessary with this patch set. I will post a clean-up
patch when your changes are accepted.
You can add my tested-by if you want:
Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
> index 2d31d4d..ec5a14b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ struct xgene_msi_group {
>
> struct xgene_msi {
> struct device_node *node;
> - struct msi_controller mchip;
> - struct irq_domain *domain;
> + struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
> + struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
> u64 msi_addr;
> void __iomem *msi_regs;
> unsigned long *bitmap;
> @@ -252,17 +252,17 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>
> static int xgene_allocate_domains(struct xgene_msi *msi)
> {
> - msi->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, NR_MSI_VEC,
> - &msi_domain_ops, msi);
> - if (!msi->domain)
> + msi->inner_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, NR_MSI_VEC,
> + &msi_domain_ops, msi);
> + if (!msi->inner_domain)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - msi->mchip.domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(msi->mchip.of_node,
> - &xgene_msi_domain_info,
> - msi->domain);
> + msi->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(msi->node,
> + &xgene_msi_domain_info,
> + msi->inner_domain);
>
> - if (!msi->mchip.domain) {
> - irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
> + if (!msi->msi_domain) {
> + irq_domain_remove(msi->inner_domain);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> @@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ static int xgene_allocate_domains(struct xgene_msi *msi)
>
> static void xgene_free_domains(struct xgene_msi *msi)
> {
> - if (msi->mchip.domain)
> - irq_domain_remove(msi->mchip.domain);
> - if (msi->domain)
> - irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
> + if (msi->msi_domain)
> + irq_domain_remove(msi->msi_domain);
> + if (msi->inner_domain)
> + irq_domain_remove(msi->inner_domain);
> }
>
> static int xgene_msi_init_allocator(struct xgene_msi *xgene_msi)
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void xgene_msi_isr(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> * CPU0
> */
> hw_irq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(hw_irq);
> - virq = irq_find_mapping(xgene_msi->domain, hw_irq);
> + virq = irq_find_mapping(xgene_msi->inner_domain, hw_irq);
> WARN_ON(!virq);
> if (virq != 0)
> generic_handle_irq(virq);
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int xgene_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto error;
> }
> xgene_msi->msi_addr = res->start;
> -
> + xgene_msi->node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> xgene_msi->num_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
>
> rc = xgene_msi_init_allocator(xgene_msi);
> @@ -561,19 +561,10 @@ static int xgene_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> cpu_notifier_register_done();
>
> - xgene_msi->mchip.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> - rc = of_pci_msi_chip_add(&xgene_msi->mchip);
> - if (rc) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add MSI controller chip\n");
> - goto error_notifier;
> - }
> -
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "APM X-Gene PCIe MSI driver loaded\n");
>
> return 0;
>
> -error_notifier:
> - unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&xgene_msi_cpu_notifier);
> error:
> xgene_msi_remove(pdev);
> return rc;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Regards,
Duc Dang.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 14/15] PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller
2015-07-09 22:12 ` Duc Dang
@ 2015-07-10 8:43 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-10 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Duc,
On 09/07/15 23:12, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> The XGene MSI driver only uses the msi_controller structure as
>> a way to match the host bridge with its MSI HW, and thus the
>> msi_domain.
>>
>> But now that we can directly associate an msi_domain with a device,
>> there is no use keeping this msi_controller around.
>>
>> Just remove all traces of msi_controller from the driver.
>>
> Thanks, Marc.
>
> I tested this patch set and it works on my APM X-Gene evaluation platform.
Ah, thanks! I did that as a side effort, but didn't have a chance to
test it (who the *&%^!! decided to mount this board in a 1U chassis
without an angle bracket for the PCIe bus? Seriously???).
> The xgene_pcie_msi_enable (in driver/pci/host/pci-xgene.c), which is
> used to get msi_controller for X-Gene PCIe port,
> also becomes unnecessary with this patch set. I will post a clean-up
> patch when your changes are accepted.
Yeah, I didn't want to touch too much of it without any testing.
> You can add my tested-by if you want:
>
> Tested-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Thanks a lot for that,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 15/15] PCI/MSI: Drop domain field from msi_controller
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-07 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Lorenzo Pieralisi
15 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-07 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The only three users of that field are not using the msi_controller
structure anymore, so drop it altogether.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 2 --
include/linux/msi.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 5ffc340..d62fdb0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_msi_get_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
domain = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
- if (!domain && dev->bus->msi)
- domain = dev->bus->msi->domain;
if (!domain)
domain = arch_get_pci_msi_domain(dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 8ac4a68..692f217 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -108,9 +108,6 @@ struct msi_controller {
struct device *dev;
struct device_node *of_node;
struct list_head list;
-#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
- struct irq_domain *domain;
-#endif
int (*setup_irq)(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *dev,
struct msi_desc *desc);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain
2015-07-07 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Marc Zyngier
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-07-07 17:18 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] PCI/MSI: Drop domain field from msi_controller Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-09 13:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-09 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
15 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2015-07-09 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:17:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> [Picking up this series again after sleeping on it for too long,
> hopefully still relevant]
>
> MSI-like interrupts are starting to creep out of the PCI world, and
> can now be seen into a number of "platform"-type busses. The
> introduction of the MSI domains feature in v3.19 recognised that fact,
> and started providing a way to implement this.
>
> Another problem we have to solve is to identify which MSI domain a
> device is "connected" to. Currently, PCI gets away with a mixture of
> arch-specific callbacks, and a msi_controller structure that can
> optionally carry a pointer to an MSI domain. As we add new bus types
> and start dealing with topologies that do not map to what PCI does,
> this doesn't scale anymore.
>
> This patch series tries to address some of it by providing a basic
> link between 'struct device' and an MSI domain. It also adds :
>
> - a way to "tag" domains according to the "type" of interrupt it
> provides (PCI/MSI, platform MSI...), allowing a driver for a piece
> of HW identified by its device_node to provide several IRQ domains
>
> - (yet another) way for PCI to propagate the domain pointer through
> the PCI device hierarchy, providing a method for OF to kick-start
> the propagation process, and finally allowing the PCI/MSI layer to
> use that information
>
> - a similar way to hook an MSI domain to a platform device.
>
> Hopefully this can serve as a model to implement support for different
> but types.
>
> Additionally, the last few patches use all the above to remove any
> trace of the msi_controller structure from the three MSI controllers
> we use on arm64, so that they solely rely on the above infrastructure,
> leading to some interesting improvements. We take this opportunity to
> also kill the domain pointer from the msi_controller structure.
>
> My hope is to eventually kill msi_controller entirely, and only rely
> on the msi_domain contained in the device structure (any help
> welcomed).
And kill pcibios_msi_controller from arch/arm, which means we have
to convert all arm platforms relying on pci_sys_data for the MSI look-up,
I only have an iMX6 Sabrelite, so yes, help is welcome here.
BTW, is there a reason why _all_ arm host bridges rely on
pcibios_msi_controller (so pci_sys_data) instead of initializing
the struct pci_bus.msi pointer to carry out the MSI controller look-up ?
I do not see any (and I want to get rid of pcibios_msi_controller on
arm asap, if we can use the struct pci_bus.msi pointer patch that's
trivial).
I know that the way forward is by doing it through domains and this
patchset, just asking (to understand why pcibios_msi_controller is
even needed on arm at present).
> This has been tested on arm64 with GICv2m (AMD Seattle) and GICv3 ITS
> (FVP model).
I tested it on arm64 AMD Seattle too, so FWIW:
Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Patches are on top of 4.2-rc1 and available at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git irq/msi_domain
>
> As always, comments most welcome.
>
> Marc Zyngier (15):
> genirq: irqdomain: Allow irq domain aliasing
> PCI: MSI: Register irq domain with specific token
> device core: Introduce per-device MSI domain pointer
> PCI/MSI: Add hooks to populate the msi_domain field
> PCI/MSI: of: Add support for OF-provided msi_domain
> PCI/MSI: of: Allow msi_domain lookup using the host bridge node
> PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct device's msi_domain
> platform: of: Assign MSI domain to platform device
> irqchip: gicv3-its: Split PCI/MSI code from the core ITS driver
> irqchip: gicv3-its: Register irq domain with platform MSI token
> irqchip: GICv2m: Get rid of struct msi_controller
> irqchip: gicv3-its: Get rid of struct msi_controller
> irqchip: gicv3-its: Make the PCI/MSI code standalone
> PCI/MSI: pci-xgene-msi: Get rid of struct msi_controller
> PCI/MSI: Drop domain field from msi_controller
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/512x/mpc5121_ads_cpld.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/interrupt.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/flipper-pic.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/interrupt.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/i8259.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_ic.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/xics-common.c | 3 +-
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 27 ++---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 130 ++++------------------
> drivers/of/irq.c | 16 +++
> drivers/of/platform.c | 1 +
> drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c | 41 +++----
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 11 +-
> drivers/pci/of.c | 24 ++++
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 31 ++++++
> include/linux/device.h | 20 ++++
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 3 +
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 25 ++++-
> include/linux/msi.h | 3 -
> include/linux/of_irq.h | 1 +
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 +
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 18 ++-
> 29 files changed, 350 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain
2015-07-09 13:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain Lorenzo Pieralisi
@ 2015-07-09 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 13:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-09 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Lorenzo,
On 09/07/15 14:58, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:17:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> [Picking up this series again after sleeping on it for too long,
>> hopefully still relevant]
>>
>> MSI-like interrupts are starting to creep out of the PCI world, and
>> can now be seen into a number of "platform"-type busses. The
>> introduction of the MSI domains feature in v3.19 recognised that fact,
>> and started providing a way to implement this.
>>
>> Another problem we have to solve is to identify which MSI domain a
>> device is "connected" to. Currently, PCI gets away with a mixture of
>> arch-specific callbacks, and a msi_controller structure that can
>> optionally carry a pointer to an MSI domain. As we add new bus types
>> and start dealing with topologies that do not map to what PCI does,
>> this doesn't scale anymore.
>>
>> This patch series tries to address some of it by providing a basic
>> link between 'struct device' and an MSI domain. It also adds :
>>
>> - a way to "tag" domains according to the "type" of interrupt it
>> provides (PCI/MSI, platform MSI...), allowing a driver for a piece
>> of HW identified by its device_node to provide several IRQ domains
>>
>> - (yet another) way for PCI to propagate the domain pointer through
>> the PCI device hierarchy, providing a method for OF to kick-start
>> the propagation process, and finally allowing the PCI/MSI layer to
>> use that information
>>
>> - a similar way to hook an MSI domain to a platform device.
>>
>> Hopefully this can serve as a model to implement support for different
>> but types.
>>
>> Additionally, the last few patches use all the above to remove any
>> trace of the msi_controller structure from the three MSI controllers
>> we use on arm64, so that they solely rely on the above infrastructure,
>> leading to some interesting improvements. We take this opportunity to
>> also kill the domain pointer from the msi_controller structure.
>>
>> My hope is to eventually kill msi_controller entirely, and only rely
>> on the msi_domain contained in the device structure (any help
>> welcomed).
>
> And kill pcibios_msi_controller from arch/arm, which means we have
> to convert all arm platforms relying on pci_sys_data for the MSI look-up,
> I only have an iMX6 Sabrelite, so yes, help is welcome here.
Ah, yet another way to squirrel information away. Lovely. Yes, that
needs consolidating too, which means converting all ARM MSI controllers
to PCI/MSI IRQ domains. I did it for Tegra a long while ago, but don't
have the HW - anyone with a Tegra4 that could test this?
> BTW, is there a reason why _all_ arm host bridges rely on
> pcibios_msi_controller (so pci_sys_data) instead of initializing
> the struct pci_bus.msi pointer to carry out the MSI controller look-up ?
Probably an ordering issue - the bus may not be there yet. But ensuring
that the MSI domain is created early (before the bus is scanned) should
solve that problem nicely enough.
> I do not see any (and I want to get rid of pcibios_msi_controller on
> arm asap, if we can use the struct pci_bus.msi pointer patch that's
> trivial).
>
> I know that the way forward is by doing it through domains and this
> patchset, just asking (to understand why pcibios_msi_controller is
> even needed on arm at present).
>
>> This has been tested on arm64 with GICv2m (AMD Seattle) and GICv3 ITS
>> (FVP model).
>
> I tested it on arm64 AMD Seattle too, so FWIW:
>
> Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Excellent, thanks a lot!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain
2015-07-09 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2015-07-10 13:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-10 14:25 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2015-07-10 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:35:05PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> > BTW, is there a reason why _all_ arm host bridges rely on
> > pcibios_msi_controller (so pci_sys_data) instead of initializing
> > the struct pci_bus.msi pointer to carry out the MSI controller look-up ?
>
> Probably an ordering issue - the bus may not be there yet. But ensuring
> that the MSI domain is created early (before the bus is scanned) should
> solve that problem nicely enough.
Yes, I think the only reason is that, as sysdata, the msi controller
pointer is propagated (in pci_alloc_child_bus()), with a tiny difference:
sysdata can be passed to pci_scan_root_bus(), msi controller pointer
can't (explicitly) at present.
Since most of the ARM PCI host controllers have been converted to:
- pci_create_root_bus()
-> here we can init bus msi controller pointer
- pci_scan_child_bus()
we could get rid of pcibios_msi_controller on arm _now_ by just initializing
the msi controller pointer in the struct pci_bus before
pci_scan_child_bus() is called, unless I am missing something.
I converted pcie-designware.c to stacked domains (and pci-keystone that
relies on it, with its own quirks of course), I might take the step
above as an intermediate step to have a common arm/arm64 generic host
controller asap (ie for that getting rid of pcibios_msi_controller is
mandatory, which requires converting all ARM host controllers to stacked
domains, or taking the intermediate step above).
Thanks,
Lorenzo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 00/15] Introducing per-device MSI domain
2015-07-10 13:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
@ 2015-07-10 14:25 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-07-10 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 10/07/15 14:34, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:35:05PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> BTW, is there a reason why _all_ arm host bridges rely on
>>> pcibios_msi_controller (so pci_sys_data) instead of initializing
>>> the struct pci_bus.msi pointer to carry out the MSI controller look-up ?
>>
>> Probably an ordering issue - the bus may not be there yet. But ensuring
>> that the MSI domain is created early (before the bus is scanned) should
>> solve that problem nicely enough.
>
> Yes, I think the only reason is that, as sysdata, the msi controller
> pointer is propagated (in pci_alloc_child_bus()), with a tiny difference:
> sysdata can be passed to pci_scan_root_bus(), msi controller pointer
> can't (explicitly) at present.
>
> Since most of the ARM PCI host controllers have been converted to:
>
> - pci_create_root_bus()
>
> -> here we can init bus msi controller pointer
>
> - pci_scan_child_bus()
>
> we could get rid of pcibios_msi_controller on arm _now_ by just initializing
> the msi controller pointer in the struct pci_bus before
> pci_scan_child_bus() is called, unless I am missing something.
>
> I converted pcie-designware.c to stacked domains (and pci-keystone that
> relies on it, with its own quirks of course), I might take the step
> above as an intermediate step to have a common arm/arm64 generic host
> controller asap (ie for that getting rid of pcibios_msi_controller is
> mandatory, which requires converting all ARM host controllers to stacked
> domains, or taking the intermediate step above).
It doesn't look like the two approaches are incompatible. Killing
pcibios_msi_controller is an interesting short term goal which could
happen quite quickly. Converting these host controllers to stacked
domains is obviously more effort, which can happen at its own pace. We
just need to make sure people do not add more cruft to the mix in the
meantime.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread