linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for non-pci devices
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:01:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559E6289.6060802@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559DD4B6.9000403@huawei.com>

On 09/07/15 02:56, leizhen wrote:
[...]
>>> @@ -1928,9 +1929,35 @@ static int arm_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
[...]
>>> +        for (i = 0; i < args->args_count; i++) {
>>
>> I'm dubious of the value of looping here - having n>1 #iommu-cells per phandle means that every platform device behind one SMMU must have the same number of stream IDs, or you still have to have
>> repeated phandles for every device with some greater multiple of n stream IDs each, but ruling out any device with <n. I'm not sure how realistic that is, and whether there's any real benefit beyond
>> saving a handful of bytes in the DTB.
>
> As you mentioned before, a master with two streamIDs can be written as below(This is also mentioned in Documentation\devicetree\bindings\iommu\iommu.txt):
> #iommu-cells = <1>;
> iommus = <&{/iommu} 23>, <&{/iommu} 24>;
>
> On my hardware platform, a master only have one streamID. But I tested two cases:
> #iommu-cells = <1>;
> 1. iommus = <&smmu0 good-sid>, <&smmu0 bad-sid>;
> 2. iommus = <&smmu0 bad-sid>, <&smmu0 good-sid>;
> All of these two cases worked well.
>
> Well, if each master contains two streamIDs(or more but equal), this for loop is needed.

My point is that args_count == #iommu-cells here. If you mandate 
#iommu-cells == 1 as per your example (which in my opinion *is* the 
right thing to do), then looping over something which is guaranteed to 
be a single item is pointless.

You'd only need the loop if args_count > 1, for example:

	#iommu-cells = <2>;
	1: iommus = <&smmu0 sid1 sid2>;
	2: iommus = <&smmu0 sid1 sid2>, <&smmu0 sid3 sid4>;

but then you'd be also stuck describing any device with an odd number of 
stream IDs on that SMMU:

	3: iommus = <&smmu0 sid1 what-do-I-put-here?>;

which is why I don't think it's worth trying to accommodate anything 
other than #iommu-cells == 1, and for that case you know you will only 
ever have to deal with args[0] in each of_xlate() call.

Robin.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-07  3:30 [PATCH v2 0/9] bugfixs and add support for non-pci devices Zhen Lei
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the assignment of L1 table log2entries Zhen Lei
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the index calculation of strtab Zhen Lei
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the values of ARM64_TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT and ARM64_TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT Zhen Lei
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: enlarge STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT to support larger sidsize Zhen Lei
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu: skip the execution of CMD_PREFETCH_CONFIG Zhen Lei
2015-07-08 13:03   ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-08 17:11     ` Will Deacon
2015-07-09  1:30       ` leizhen
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu: to support probe deferral Zhen Lei
2015-07-08 13:13   ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-09 11:10     ` leizhen
2015-07-09 11:27       ` Will Deacon
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu: remove arm_smmu_devices Zhen Lei
2015-07-08 13:13   ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-09  2:43     ` leizhen
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu: rename __arm_smmu_get_pci_sid Zhen Lei
2015-07-07  3:30 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for non-pci devices Zhen Lei
2015-07-08 13:22   ` Robin Murphy
2015-07-09  1:56     ` leizhen
2015-07-09 12:01       ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2015-07-10  0:34         ` leizhen
2015-07-07  9:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] bugfixs and " Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559E6289.6060802@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).