From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:33:14 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 device support In-Reply-To: References: <1436442431-3471-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <559E6C9A.8090004@linaro.org> <559E6EBA.3020401@linaro.org> Message-ID: <559FB482.4020503@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > 2015-07-09 21:53 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath : >> >> >> On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:14 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 05:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> >>>> 2015-07-09 20:47 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath >>>> : >>>>> >>>>> 88PM860 falls under 88pm800 family of devices, with some feature >>>>> additions, for example, support for dual phase on BUCK1. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> There are already drivers for 88PM860: mfd, charger and battery. Isn't >>>> you duplicating existing code? >>>> >>> >>> Can you please point me to MFD driver for 88PM860 (Not the charger and >>> battery, as I treat them subdevice) ??? >>> >>> I do not think 88PM860 MFD driver is supported already. Correct me if I >>> am wrong. >>> >> >> If you are referring to 88pm860x driver, then the answer is NO, >> as they both are totally different. > > I am confused... so the driver drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c and its > child drivers do not support 88pm860 device? They support 88pm860x > device which is totally different than 88pm860 device? > Yes, that's correct. That's my understanding as well. Thanks, Vaibhav