linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org (Srinivas Kandagatla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/9] Documentation: nvmem: add nvmem api level and how-to doc
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:00:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A5866B.60200@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714213205.GO30412@codeaurora.org>



On 14/07/15 22:32, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/10, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/nvmem/nvmem.txt b/Documentation/nvmem/nvmem.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b074b71
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/nvmem/nvmem.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
>> +			    NVMEM SUBSYSTEM
>> +	  Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>> +
>> +This document explains the Simple NVMEM Framework along with the APIs provided,
>
> Why is simple and framework capitalized? Is it the "Simple NVMEM
> Framework" or just the "NVMEM" framework?
>
>> +and how-to-use.
>
> how to use it?
yep,

Thanks Stephen,

I will fix all the comments you raised in next version.

>
>> +
>> +1. Introduction
>> +===============
>> +*NVMEM* is the abbreviation for Non Volatile Memory layer. It is used to
>> +retrieve configuration or SOC or Device specific data from a non volatile memories
>                            ^                                   ^
>                            of                                  remove a?
>
>> +like eeprom, efuses and so on.
>> +
>> +Up until now, NVMEM drivers like eeprom were stored in drivers/misc, where they
>
> Up until now will soon be out of date, perhaps say "before this
> framework existed"?
>
>> +all had to duplicate pretty much the same code to register a sysfs file, allow
>> +in-kernel users to access the content of the devices they were driving, etc.
>> +
>> +This was also a problem as far as other in-kernel users were involved, since
>> +the solutions used were pretty much different from on driver to another, there
>                                                         ^
>                                                         one
>
yep, will fix it.
>> +was a rather big abstraction leak.
>> +
>> +Introduction of this framework aims at solving this. It also introduces DT
>
> This framework aims to solve these problems.
>
>> +representation for consumer devices to go get the data they require (MAC
>> +Addresses, SoC/Revision ID, part numbers, and so on) from the NVMEMs.
>> +This framework is based on regmap, so that most of the abstraction
>> +available in regmap can be reused, across multiple types of buses.
>> +
>> +NVMEM Providers
>> ++++++++++++++++
>> +
>> +NVMEM provider refers to an entity that implements methods to initialize, read
>> +and write the non-volatile memory.
>> +
>> +2. Registering/Unregistering the NVMEM provider
>> +===============================================
>> +
>> +A NVMEM provider can register with NVMEM core by suppling relevant
>                                                       ^
>                                                      supplying
>
>> +nvmem configuration to nvmem_register(), on success core would return a valid
>> +nvmem_device pointer.
>> +
>> +nvmem_unregister(nvmem) is used to unregister the already registered provider.
>
> unregister a previously registered provider?
>
>> +
>> +For example for simple qfprom case:
>
> For example, a simple qfprom case:
>
oops.. I will fix it.
>> +
>> +static struct nvmem_config econfig = {
>> +	.name = "qfprom",
>> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int qfprom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	...
>> +	econfig.dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	nvmem = nvmem_register(&econfig);
>> +	...
>> +}
>> +
>> +It is mandatory that the NVMEM provider has a regmap associated with its
>> +struct device.
>
> How do I ensure that?

yes, I think I need to add few lines on the errors which would make it 
more explicit.

>
>> +
>> +NVMEM Consumers
>> ++++++++++++++++
>> +
>> +NVMEM consumers are the entities which make use of the NVMEM provider to
>> +read/write into NVMEM.
>
> read from and write to NVMEM?
>
Yep.

>> +
>> +3. NVMEM cell based consumer APIs.
>> +=================================
>> +
>> +NVMEM cells are the data entries/fields in the NVMEM.
>> +The NVMEM framework provides 3 APIs to read/write NVMEM cells.
>> +
>> +struct nvmem_cell *nvmem_cell_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>> +struct nvmem_cell *devm_nvmem_cell_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>> +
>> +void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell);
>> +void devm_nvmem_cell_put(struct device *dev, struct nvmem_cell *cell);
>> +
>> +void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, ssize_t *len);
>> +int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, ssize_t len);
>> +
>> +*nvmem_cell_get() apis will get a reference to nvmem cell for a given id,
>> +and nvmem_cell_read/write() can then directly read or write to the cell.
>
> Drop "directly"?
>
ok.

>> +Once the usage of the cell is finished the consumer should call *nvmem_cell_put()
>> +to free all the allocation memory for the cell.
>> +
>> +4. Direct NVMEM device based consumer APIs.
>                                               ^
>                                               Drop the full stop?
>
>> +==========================================
>> +
>> +In some instances it is necessary to directly read/write the NVMEM.
>> +To facilitate such consumers NVMEM framework provides below apis.
>> +
>> +struct nvmem_device *nvmem_device_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>> +struct nvmem_device *devm_nvmem_device_get(struct device *dev,
>> +					   const char *name);
>> +void nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem);
>> +int nvmem_device_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, unsigned int offset,
>> +		      size_t bytes, void *buf);
>> +int nvmem_device_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, unsigned int offset,
>> +		       size_t bytes, void *buf);
>> +int nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> +			   struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf);
>> +int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> +			    struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf);
>> +
>> +Before the consumers can read/write NVMEM directly, it should get hold
>                                                                      ^
>                                                                      a
>> +of nvmem_controller from one of the *nvmem_device_get() api.
>> +
>> +Difference between these apis and cell based apis is that these apis
>     ^
>     The
>
yes, will fix it.
>> +always take nvmem_device as parameter.
>> +
>> +5. Releasing a reference to the NVMEM
>> +=====================================
>> +
>> +When the consumers no longer needs the NVMEM, it has to release the reference
>
> When a consumer no longer needs?
yep I will fix it.
>
>> +to the NVMEM it has obtained using the APIs mentioned in the above section.
>> +NVMEM framework provides 2 APIs to release a reference to the NVMEM.
>     ^
>     The
>
>> +
>> +void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell);
>> +void devm_nvmem_cell_put(struct device *dev, struct nvmem_cell *cell);
>> +void nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem);
>> +void devm_nvmem_device_put(struct device *dev, struct nvmem_device *nvmem);
>> +
>> +Both these APIs are used to release a reference to the NVMEM and
>> +devm_nvmem_cell_put and devm_nvmem_device_put destroys the devres associated
>> +with this NVMEM.
>
>         s/this/the/
sure, will fix it.
>
>> +
>> +Userspace
>> ++++++++++
>> +
>> +6. Userspace binary interface.
>                                  ^
>                                  Drop the full stop?
>
>> +==============================
>> +
>> +Userspace can read/write the raw NVMEM file located at
>> +/sys/bus/nvmem/devices/*/nvmem
>> +
>> +ex:
>> +
>> +hexdump /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/qfprom0/nvmem
>> +
>> +0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
>> +*
>> +00000a0 db10 2240 0000 e000 0c00 0c00 0000 0c00
>> +0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
>> +...
>> +*
>> +0001000
>> +
>> +7. DeviceTree Binding
>> +=====================
>> +
>> +The documentation for NVMEM dt binding can be found @
>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.txt
>
> How about?
>
> See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.txt
sounds good.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-14 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-10  9:43 [PATCH v7 0/9] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:44 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for nvmem providers Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10 10:29   ` Joe Perches
2015-07-10 10:39     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-13 16:50   ` Philipp Zabel
2015-07-10  9:44 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for consumers Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10 10:42   ` Joe Perches
2015-07-13 19:06   ` Stefan Wahren
2015-07-13 19:24     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10 10:49   ` Joe Perches
2015-07-14 22:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-15  8:21     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] nvmem: Add bindings for simple nvmem framework Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10 19:04   ` Rob Herring
2015-07-13 10:21     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] Documentation: nvmem: add nvmem api level and how-to doc Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-14 21:32   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-14 22:00     ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2015-07-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] nvmem: qfprom: Add Qualcomm QFPROM support Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-14 21:18   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-14 22:02     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] nvmem: qfprom: Add bindings for qfprom Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:45 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem framework Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-10  9:46 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] nvmem: Add to MAINTAINERS for " Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-13 18:54 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap Stefan Wahren
2015-07-13 19:35   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2015-07-13 20:11     ` Stefan Wahren
2015-07-13 21:39       ` Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A5866B.60200@linaro.org \
    --to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).