From: m.smarduch@samsung.com (Mario Smarduch)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:22:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A80464.7000701@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150716190529.GA14369@cbox>
On 07/16/2015 12:05 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:23:08AM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>> On 07/16/2015 08:52 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:19:05PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>>> This is a followp to previous iteration but implemented on top of VHE patches.
>>>> Only non-VHE path is addressied by this patch. In second patch 32-bit handler
>>>> is updated to keep exit handling consistent with 64-bit code, and nothing
>>>> has changed.
>>>>
>>> Why not simply preserve this the way it was in v3 and have it merged
>>> first - after all we have reviewed it and I thought it was more or less
>>> ready to be merged - I suspect the VHE patches may have a way to go
>>> still ?
>>
>> Definitely, that's a better path. After looking at VHE patches,
>> I would probably leave V3 the way it is (keeping deactivate_xxxx:
>> symmetric). Marc has Reviewed V3 and you commented either way was
>> fine with you, so V3 should be ok.
>
> Yes, but there was a comment in the assembly file to fix up IIRC.
That's right 1/2 and 0/2 header need little bit of editing.
>
> Can you do a quick respin with that commentary changed and then Marc
> can queue that if he agrees?
>
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-11 1:19 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 non-VHE fpsimd skip 30-50% save/restore on exits Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] keep arm vfp/simd exit handling consistent with arm64 Mario Smarduch
2015-07-16 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2015-07-16 18:23 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-16 19:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-16 19:22 ` Mario Smarduch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A80464.7000701@samsung.com \
--to=m.smarduch@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).