From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:11:14 +0300
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC
 node in the example
In-Reply-To: <1437114567-17629-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
References: <1437114567-17629-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
 <1437114567-17629-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
Message-ID: <55A8C6B2.5020109@cogentembedded.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello.

On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat

    ePAPR.

> generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise
> programming model."

> So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic
> node name instead of using the chip's name.

> Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

MBR, Sergei