From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: kernel: Add min/max values in feature-detection register values.
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:05:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A8E163.5010607@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150717105110.GL18994@arm.com>
On 17/07/15 11:51, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 05:01:57PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
>> When a new cpu feature is available, the cpu feature bits will be 0001,
>> when features are updated, this value will be incremented. This patch
>> changes 'register_value' to be '{min,max}_register_value', and checks
>> the value falls in this range.
>
> I'm not sure this is completely true. For example, the new atomics are
> advertised with feature bits of 0002, whilst 0001 is RESERVED and 0000
> means they're not present.
>
> Also, the problem with specifying an upper bound is that we have to keep
> updating it. Elsewhere in the kernel, we've treated these as 4-bit signed
> fields and if X > Y, we assume that the feature set of X is a superset of
> Y. Unfortunately, the ARM ARM doesn't provide this insight but it is
> something that we teased out of the architects.
>
> Does PAN break our assumptions here?
No, it just needs to match 1 and 2.
Would you prefer a 'min_register_value' and some careful 4-bit
sign-extension logic to use the 'if X > Y' logic?
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 16:01 [PATCH 0/5] arm64: kernel: Add support for Privileged Access Never James Morse
2015-07-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: kernel: preparatory: Move config_sctlr_el1 James Morse
2015-07-17 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-17 12:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: kernel: Add cpufeature 'enable' callback James Morse
2015-07-17 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: kernel: Add min/max values in feature-detection register values James Morse
2015-07-17 10:51 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-17 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-17 11:05 ` James Morse [this message]
2015-07-17 12:45 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: kernel: Add optional CONFIG_ parameter to ALTERNATIVE() James Morse
2015-07-17 11:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: kernel: Add support for Privileged Access Never James Morse
2015-07-17 12:57 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A8E163.5010607@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).