From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:51:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm: sti: adapt DT to fix probe/bind issues in DRM
 driver
In-Reply-To: <1437133510-13615-2-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
References: <1437133510-13615-1-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
 <1437133510-13615-2-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <55A8EC3F.6050903@st.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear ARM SoC Maintainers,

On 07/17/2015 01:45 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> STI drm drivers probe and bind using component framework was incorrect.
> In addition to drivers fix DT update is needed to make all sub-components
> become childs of sti-display-subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stih410.dtsi | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>   2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
>

This patch solves an issue preventing DRM driver probing, but it breaks 
the DT ABI.
For now, this driver and its DT node are only used by a few identified 
people.

Since these people only use aligned version of Kernel and DT, do you 
accept we break the ABI for this time?

Thanks in advance,
Maxime