From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:51:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A986DD.3010104@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e1c7fcc1fb62f73c82bd57d196d054ba2607a55.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On 06/15/2015 04:57 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -112,12 +129,14 @@ struct dev_pm_opp {
> struct device_opp {
> struct list_head node;
>
> - struct device *dev;
> struct srcu_notifier_head srcu_head;
> struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> + struct list_head dev_list;
> struct list_head opp_list;
>
> + struct device_node *np;
> unsigned long clock_latency_ns_max;
> + bool shared_opp;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -137,6 +156,40 @@ do { \
> "dev_opp_list_lock protection"); \
> } while (0)
>
> +static struct device_list_opp *_find_list_dev(struct device *dev,
const device?
> + struct device_opp *dev_opp)
> +{
> + struct device_list_opp *list_dev;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(list_dev, &dev_opp->dev_list, node)
> + if (list_dev->dev == dev)
> + return list_dev;
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(struct device_node *np)
const device_node?
> +{
> + struct device_opp *dev_opp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(dev_opp, &dev_opp_list, node)
> + if (dev_opp->np == np) {
> + /*
> + * Multiple devices can point to the same OPP table and
> + * so will have same node-pointer, np.
> + *
> + * But the OPPs will be considered as shared only if the
> + * OPP table contains a "opp-shared" property.
> + */
> + if (dev_opp->shared_opp)
> + return dev_opp;
> + else
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * _find_device_opp() - find device_opp struct using device pointer
> * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs
> @@ -454,6 +504,39 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>
> +/* List-dev Helpers */
> +static void _kfree_list_dev_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct device_list_opp *list_dev;
> +
> + list_dev = container_of(head, struct device_list_opp, rcu_head);
> + kfree_rcu(list_dev, rcu_head);
> +}
> +
> +static void _remove_list_dev(struct device_list_opp *list_dev,
> + struct device_opp *dev_opp)
> +{
> + list_del(&list_dev->node);
> + call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &list_dev->rcu_head,
> + _kfree_list_dev_rcu);
> +}
> +
> +static struct device_list_opp *_add_list_dev(struct device *dev,
Can dev be const here too?
> + struct device_opp *dev_opp)
> +{
> + struct device_list_opp *list_dev;
> +
> + list_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*list_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!list_dev)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Initialize list-dev */
> + list_add_rcu(&list_dev->node, &dev_opp->dev_list);
> + list_dev->dev = dev;
> +
> + return list_dev;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * _add_device_opp() - Returns device OPP table
> * @dev: device for which we do this operation
> @@ -466,6 +549,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
> static struct device_opp *_add_device_opp(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct device_opp *dev_opp;
> + struct device_list_opp *list_dev;
>
> /* Check for existing list for 'dev' first */
> dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
> @@ -621,7 +722,8 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_allocate_opp(struct device *dev,
> return opp;
> }
>
> -static int _opp_add(struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp, struct device_opp *dev_opp)
> +static int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp,
> + struct device_opp *dev_opp)
> {
> struct dev_pm_opp *opp = NULL;
> struct list_head *head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
>
>
>
> @@ -1100,8 +1217,19 @@ static int _of_init_opp_table_v2(struct device *dev,
> if (WARN_ON(!count))
> goto put_opp_np;
>
> - if (ret)
> + if (!ret) {
> + if (!dev_opp) {
> + dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
> + if (WARN_ON(!dev_opp))
> + goto put_opp_np;
> + }
> +
> + dev_opp->np = opp_np;
> + if (of_get_property(opp_np, "opp-shared", NULL))
dev_opp->shared_opp = of_property_read_bool(opp_np, "opp-shared")?
> + dev_opp->shared_opp = true;
> + } else {
> of_free_opp_table(dev);
> + }
>
> put_opp_np:
> of_node_put(opp_np);
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 11:57 [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] OPP: Create _remove_device_opp() for freeing dev_opp Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp() Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] OPP: Break _opp_add_dynamic() into smaller functions Viresh Kumar
2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] OPP: Add clock-latency-ns support Viresh Kumar
2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Viresh Kumar
2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] OPP: Add support for opp-suspend Viresh Kumar
2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] opp: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq-dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-30 16:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support " Viresh Kumar
2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A986DD.3010104@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).