From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] genirq: irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:43:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AF8FF6.3080901@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507220958090.18576@nanos>
On 22/07/15 08:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>> Looks like my coccinelle foo is still lacking a bit... Oh well.
>
> Please post your semantic patch and don't forget to Cc Julia Lawall :)
>
Bah, found the problem. My semantic patch is extremely simple:
@init@
struct irq_domain *ptr;
position pos;
@@
(
ptr at pos->of_node
)
@ script:python @
p1 << init.pos;
@@
for p in p1:
print "%s:%s" % (p.file,p.line)
as I'm just grepping through the tree (I don't feel confident enough to
do the patching, and some cases are a bit more complicated).
But I forgot to add arch/$ARCH/include/asm as an include search path for
spatch. That had the side effect of spatch being unable to identify
constructs like:
arch/$ARCH/include/asm/foo.h:
struct foo {
struct irq_domain *bar;
};
arch/$ARCH/.../foo.c:
struct foo foo;
if (foo->bar->of_node) { ... }
Since spatch knows nothing about struct foo, it cannot identify bar as a
struct irq_domain, hence missing this occurrence.
Once I fixed the include path, I found an additional couple of victims.
I really love this thing! :-)
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-22 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 10:07 [PATCH 0/5] Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] genirq: irqdomain: Use an accessor for the of_node field Marc Zyngier
2015-07-22 7:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-22 7:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-22 7:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-22 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-07-22 7:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-21 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] genirq: irqdomain: Remove irqdomain dependency on struct device_node Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 17:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-22 8:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-23 8:59 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-07-21 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] genirq: irqdomain: Add irq_create_acpi_mappings Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 10:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi: gsi: Use acpi_gsi_descriptor to allocate interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 18:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-22 7:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] irqchip: GIC: Switch ACPI support to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 12:34 ` Graeme Gregory
2015-07-21 13:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-21 18:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-21 18:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-22 8:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-22 8:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-22 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-22 9:33 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-21 12:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] Making the generic ACPI GSI layer irqdomain aware Graeme Gregory
2015-07-22 6:45 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55AF8FF6.3080901@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).