From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:19:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) In-Reply-To: <55AE8A02.9070801@codeaurora.org> References: <1433760002-24120-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1433760002-24120-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20150702172310.GF4301@codeaurora.org> <5596A1B6.8020307@arm.com> <559ADC94.4080505@codeaurora.org> <559BF858.1020301@arm.com> <20150708014606.GH30412@codeaurora.org> <55A7D79B.3080305@arm.com> <20150716193114.GA17952@codeaurora.org> <55A8E434.2010709@arm.com> <55A945DF.3@codeaurora.org> <55ACB733.2080609@arm.com> <55AE8A02.9070801@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <55AFA665.4020906@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 21/07/15 19:05, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/20/2015 01:54 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 17/07/15 19:13, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 07/17/2015 04:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> >>>> determine_rate change shouldn't affect SCPI clock driver but I remember >>>> seeing round_rate change too on the list which returns value using the >>>> argument from Boris. Is that planned for v4.3 ? I would need the stable >>>> branch from this clk_hw_set_rate_range if you decide to push. Let me >>>> know your preferences. I will post the updated version of the patch >>>> accordingly. >>>> >>> >>> We're not going to change round_rate() so it sounds like you don't need >>> a stable branch. But you would need this new consumer API. So you still >>> need a branch right? >>> >> >> I am fine either way. If no one else need the stable branch to be shared >> with arm-soc, I prefer to use clock consumer API for now to avoid all >> the troubles to you guys and switch to provider API later. I will post >> it once the both this driver and that provider API is merged, if that's >> fine with you ? > > Ok. Sounds fine as long as we don't forget. > It's ready indeed :), will post it when everything is in place. Regards, Sudeep --->8 From 3ddf7fe5b1286efa712d4f2ba8108ce1855f3e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sudeep Holla Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:19:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] clk: scpi: use provider clk_hw_set_rate_range API instead of consumer API SCPI clock provider uses the consumer API clk_set_rate_range to set min/max rate constraints on the clocks it provides. Commit c87c640f915a ("clk: Allow providers to configure min/max rates") added a separate provider API clk_hw_set_rate_range to set the min/max rate of a clock. This patch switches away from clk_set_rate_range consumer API to clk_hw_set_rate_range provider API. Cc: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c index 06d0558e8f46..f7c8b7a03cfe 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scpi.c @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ scpi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, const struct of_device_id *match, clk = devm_clk_register(dev, &sclk->hw); if (!IS_ERR(clk) && max) - clk_set_rate_range(clk, min, max); + clk_hw_set_rate_range(&sclk->hw, min, max); return clk; } -- 1.9.1