From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: michal.simek@xilinx.com (Michal Simek) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:27:53 +0200 Subject: [RFC 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq PL Reset bindings. In-Reply-To: <1437722723.3834.3.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1437691862-21312-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437691862-21312-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437722723.3834.3.camel@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <55B1E8F9.6060704@xilinx.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/24/2015 09:25 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2015, 15:51 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer: >> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..ac4499e >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ >> +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl" >> +- syscon <&slcr>; >> +- #reset-cells: 1 >> + >> +Example: >> + rstc: rstc at 240 { >> + #reset-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"; >> + syscon = <&slcr>; >> + }; > > Instead of the syscon property, why not specify that the rstc node must > be a child of the slcr node? FYI: It is already a child node of SLCR if you look at location in DTS. Thanks, Michal