From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath) Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:09:42 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add clock subdevice node information In-Reply-To: References: <1437476823-3358-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1437476823-3358-3-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <55BAA17F.1070305@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <55C1AFAE.3000500@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 31 July 2015 03:51 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 07/22/2015 10:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> >>> 2015-07-21 20:07 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath : >>>> >>>> This patch updates the binding documentation for optional >>>> clocks node and related information for buffered 32KHz clock. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 28 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) >>> >>> +Cc Stephen Boyd (clocks) >>> >>> We had a discussion whether clock bindings should be put in MFD >>> bindings documentation or into separate file in bindings/clock but >>> either way is fine for me: >> >> >> No patch? :) >> >> I think Rob has been pushing for MFDs to document everything within one >> file, but either way is fine from clk perspective. > > I don't recall that exactly. I did say that child bindings need to > point back to the MFD binding. So this is fine with me: > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > Thanks Rob for the ack. Can this be queued now (for next merge window)? Thanks, Vaibhav