From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: julien.grall@citrix.com (Julien Grall) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:31:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] xen: Make clear that swiotlb and biomerge are dealing with DMA address In-Reply-To: References: <1438711972-18752-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1438711972-18752-3-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> Message-ID: <55C1E5ED.10103@citrix.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Stefano, On 05/08/15 10:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> /* VIRT <-> MACHINE conversion */ >> #define virt_to_mfn(v) (pfn_to_mfn(virt_to_pfn(v))) >> @@ -96,7 +115,7 @@ static inline bool set_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn) >> >> bool xen_arch_need_swiotlb(struct device *dev, >> unsigned long pfn, >> - unsigned long mfn); >> + unsigned long dfn); >> unsigned long xen_get_swiotlb_free_pages(unsigned int order); > > You missed a bunch of dfn->bfn renamings. Sorry, I forgot to double check that before sending the patch. I will fix it in the next version. > Aside from those and the commit message error: > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini Thank you! Regards, -- Julien Grall