From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath) Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:33:56 +0530 Subject: [PATCH-v2 2/2] regulator: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1 In-Reply-To: <55C2A340.6020809@samsung.com> References: <1437495782-15767-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1437495782-15767-3-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <55C1CD47.3060400@linaro.org> <55C2A340.6020809@samsung.com> Message-ID: <55C2F8CC.1010308@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 06 August 2015 05:28 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05.08.2015 17:45, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >> >> >> On Thursday 23 July 2015 10:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> 2015-07-22 1:23 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath : >>>> 88PM860 device supports dual phase mode on BUCK1 output. >>>> In normal usecase, BUCK1A and BUCK1B operates independently with 3A >>>> capacity. And they both can work as a dual phase providing 6A capacity. >>>> >>>> This patch updates the regulator driver to read the respective >>>> DT property and enable dual-phase mode on BUCK1. >>>> >>>> Note that, this is init time (one time) initialization. >>>> >> >> Sorry for delayed response, was on bed rest almost for week. >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >>>> --- >>>> drivers/regulator/88pm800.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h | 3 +++ >>>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+) >>> >>> Don't you need to update the constraints also? I think the BUCK1 >>> regulator has fixed constraint of 3 A: >>> PM800_BUCK(buck1, BUCK1, BUCK_ENA, 0, 3000000, buck1_volt_range, >>> 0x55), >>> and now it can handle 6 A. >>> >> >> Actually, BUCK1A and BUCK1B both combined together provide 6A capacity. >> And as discussed earlier, we need board change for this. >> >> I am quite not sure. > > AFAIU the regulator driver creates one BUCK1 regulator with constraints > 3 A. However after your change the regulator will handle up to 6 A. > > This means that constraints set by driver are wrong. > > Additionally I can't find BUCK1A and BUCK1B regulators. Driver provides > only BUCK1. > My patch does add BUCK1A and BUCK1B, please refer to the PATCH[4/5] of earlier series, which is accepted. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6810461/ >> >> Should I read the property and update the constraint runtime during >> probe? > > Driver should provide real constraints. Find the proper way to do this. > > The pm800_regulator_info[] array is not const so you can change it in > whatever way you want (although it should be const for existing driver > because regulator core accepts const and passing it to driver_data is > not necessary). > Probably that is the only way to handle this. how about, As you mentioned, pm800_regulator_info[] is not constant, so I can update the constraint before regulator_register() and also do not register BUCK1B, if dual phase is enabled. So in summary, if (dual phase is enabled) { Update constraint of BUCK1 to 6A and do not register BUCK1B } else { register both BUCK1A and BUCK1B with default constraint of 3A. } Thanks, Vaibhav