linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/10] PCI: ACPI: Bind GIC MSI frame to PCI host bridge
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:42:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C46F74.4020307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C0C685.4000400@arm.com>

On 08/04/2015 10:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 29/07/15 11:08, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries
>> a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with
>> DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c   | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/pci/probe.c      |  3 +++
>>   include/linux/pci-acpi.h |  4 ++++
>>   3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> index 314a625..5f11653 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>
>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
>>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>   #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>> +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h>
>>   #include "pci.h"
>>
>>   /*
>> @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev)
>>   	return dev_is_pci(dev);
>>   }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> +	struct irq_domain *d = NULL;
>> +	void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev);
>
> Do you see why I positively *hate* having hardware details in generic
> layers? They propagate everywhere...
>
>> +
>> +	if (token)
>> +		d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
>> +
>> +	if (!d)
>> +		pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n");
>> +
>> +	return d;
>> +}
>> +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/
>> +
>>   static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
>>   	.name = "PCI",
>>   	.match = pci_acpi_bus_match,
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
>>   #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
>>   #include "pci.h"
>>
>> @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>   	 * should be called from here.
>>   	 */
>>   	d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus);
>> +	if (!d)
>> +		d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus);
>>
>>   	return d;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
>> index a965efa..766d045 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
>> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>>   static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { }
>>   #endif
>>
>> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus);
>> +
>>   extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[];
>>   #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM	0x07
>>   #define RESET_DELAY_DSM		0x08
>> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[];
>>   #else	/* CONFIG_ACPI */
>>   static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>>   static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>> +static inline struct irq_domain *
>> +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; }
>>   #endif	/* CONFIG_ACPI */
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
>>
>
> Once you solve the HW abstraction issue, this will be OK.

Sure, I will sync with Suravee to fix that.

Thanks for you comments!
Hanjun

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-07  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-29 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/10] ACPI GIC Self-probing, GICv2m and GICv3 support Hanjun Guo
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] irqchip / GIC: Add GIC version support in ACPI MADT Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 12:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-05 12:40     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-08-05 12:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-05 13:11         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ACPI / irqchip: Add self-probe infrastructure to initialize IRQ controller Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 12:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-05 13:24     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-08-06 16:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] irqchip / GIC / ACPI: Use IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE to simplify GICv2 init code Hanjun Guo
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] irqchip / GICv3: Refactor gic_of_init() for GICv3 driver Hanjun Guo
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] irqchip / GICv3: remove the useless comparision of device node in xlate Hanjun Guo
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] irqchip / GICv3: Add ACPI support for GICv3+ initialization Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 13:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-05 14:00     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-08-06 16:42       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-11  7:19         ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] irqchip / GICv3 / ACPI: Add GICR support via GICC structures Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 13:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-05 14:11     ` Hanjun Guo
2015-08-06 16:42       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] ACPI: GIC: Add ACPI helper functions to query irq-domain tokens for for GIC MSI and ITS Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 14:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-09  8:02     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] PCI: ACPI: Bind GIC MSI frame to PCI host bridge Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 14:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-07  8:42     ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-08-09  8:02     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-08-07 10:03   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-07 10:48     ` Mark Brown
2015-08-07 12:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] irqchip / gicv2m: Introducing gicv2m_acpi_init() Hanjun Guo
2015-08-04 14:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-09  8:04     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-08-11 22:01 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] ACPI GIC Self-probing, GICv2m and GICv3 support Timur Tabi
2015-08-11 22:24   ` [Linaro-acpi] " G Gregory
2015-08-11 22:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-11 22:36     ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-11 22:48       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-11 23:33         ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-12  7:21           ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-12 19:20             ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C46F74.4020307@linaro.org \
    --to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).