From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB3D92.6040403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33b221f9b622e3bad9d855a7ad1887b82827244.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 12-08-15 14:23, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> When core does not set the MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING flag enable
> automatic hardware controlled clock gating on the mmc interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
In general this looks good, but I wonder how intensively this has
been tested ? Also given the long latencies when using manual
clock on/off support, have you done any testing to check what
sort of latencies this adds, e.g. Both with and without
the patch, dump all the filesystem caches:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
And then do:
time cat /some/small/file/on/the/sdcard
Do this at least 3 time both with and without the patch, and see
if there are any noticable differences ?
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index f808a02..443cab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -601,8 +601,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
> rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> rval &= ~(SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON | SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON);
>
> - if (oclk_en)
> + if (oclk_en) {
> rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
> + if (!host->mmc->card ||
> + !(host->mmc->card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING))
> +
> + rval |= SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON;
> + }
>
> start = jiffies;
> end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 12:10 [PATCH 0/3] misc MMC fixes Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: simplify the SDMMC_CLKEN_LOW_PWR logic Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 1:55 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 5:52 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 11:26 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 14:42 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-17 14:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 16:21 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-12 12:23 ` [PATCH resend 1/3] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff michal.suchanek at ruk.cuni.cz
2015-08-12 12:32 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 12:40 ` [linux-sunxi] " Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 13:04 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 14:49 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-08-25 12:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-08-12 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:35 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-08-12 12:53 ` [linux-sunxi] " Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:19 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 14:57 ` Olliver Schinagl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB3D92.6040403@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).