From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:01:23 +0100
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM64: juno: SCPI and dependent drivers for v4.3
In-Reply-To: <10834223.pThsip28PI@phil>
References: <55C1E3FB.5090309@arm.com> <55CCAF50.4040503@arm.com>
 <20150821161732.GC14452@localhost> <10834223.pThsip28PI@phil>
Message-ID: <55DD8063.3080804@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On 25/08/15 22:47, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 21. August 2015, 09:17:32 schrieb Olof Johansson:
>>>> PSCI only covers CPU boot/cpuidle and platform suspend. It does not have
>>>> any provisions for DVFS and I'm not sure this could be easily
>>>> standardised (or whether we could find enough supporters to get it
>>>> adopted).
>>>
>>> Though we are not campaigning it as aggressively as PSCI.
>>
>> Which, given the resistance to pick up PSCI, this is unlikely to be used by
>> anyone...
>
> Rockchip seems to use SCPI to offload ddr frequency to a mcu scaling on the
> rk3368 ;-)
>

Good to hear that, thanks Heiko for letting us know. IMHO I must admit I
am still sceptical about large SCPI adoption.

Regards,
Sudeep