linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add entry for the Broadcom Northstar Plus SoCs
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:17:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DDF491.3090700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMioBQY9qy-S8kMJmo_=B6-KZiUkd=Ns1Uo2dGu0BiqppQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 25/08/15 16:42, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Modify the iProc MAINTAINER to cover the Nortstar Plus SoCs, and add me
>> to the list of people responsible for it.
> 
> That's not what this patch does. It removes CYGNUS from the
> description as well. Hmm?
> 
> I'm also not a fan of the complex patterns, but that's more of a
> bikeshedding comment. Does Broadcom really not have a bit more
> systematic naming than this? :)

The naming conventions are fairly simple actually:

* BCM is just a common prefix for internal names/projects/whatever
* 9 indicates that this is a development/reference board
* 4 to 5 digits designate the chip identifier

Now, if you are trying to get some sense about how the chip ids are
actually chosen, I am afraid none of us have that knowledge ;)

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
> 
> For maintainer updates, we usuallu like to see a public ack of this
> and not just a pre-acked patch. You _could_ have added it yourself
> without Scott's actual approval, after all.
> 
> 
> -Olof
> 


-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-26 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-20 17:47 [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add entry for the Broadcom Northstar Plus SoCs Jon Mason
2015-08-25 23:42 ` Olof Johansson
2015-08-26 17:17   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-08-26 18:20   ` Scott Branden
2015-08-26 19:00   ` Jon Mason
2015-08-26 20:02     ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55DDF491.3090700@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).