linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:33:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EDA040.90208@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441376587-12979-1-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com>

On 04/09/15 15:23, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> ARM64 kernel allocates 16KB kernel stack when creating a process. In case
> of low memory platforms with tough workloads on userland, this order-2
> allocation request reaches to memory pressure and performance degradation
> simultaenously since VM page allocator falls into slowpath frequently,
> which triggers page reclaim and compaction.
> 
> I believe that one of the best solutions is to reduce kernel stack size.
> According to the following data from stack tracer with some fixes, [1],
> a separate IRQ stack would greatly help to decrease a kernel stack depth.
>

Hi Jungseok Lee,

I was working on a similar patch for irq stack, (patch as a follow up email).

I suggest we work together on a single implementation. I think the only
major difference is that you're using sp_el0 as a temporary register to
store a copy of the stack-pointer to find struct thread_info, whereas I was
copying it between stacks (ends up as 2x ldp/stps), which keeps the change
restricted to irq_stack setup code.

We should get some feedback as to which approach is preferred.


Thanks,

James Morse

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-07 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-04 14:23 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: entry: Remove unnecessary calculation for S_SP in EL1h Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48   ` James Morse
2015-09-07 14:56   ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-07 15:51     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 17:12   ` Alexnader Kuleshov
2015-09-07 14:08     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48   ` James Morse
2015-09-08 14:28     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: Reduce kernel stack size when using " Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:33 ` James Morse [this message]
2015-09-07 14:36   ` [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts James Morse
2015-09-07 15:48     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 16:06       ` James Morse
2015-09-07 16:34         ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08  1:45           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08  6:44             ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:59             ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08  7:51     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:54     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 16:47       ` James Morse
2015-09-09 13:22         ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-09 18:13           ` James Morse
2015-09-10 23:30             ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 15:42   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55EDA040.90208@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).