From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EDA040.90208@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441376587-12979-1-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
On 04/09/15 15:23, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> ARM64 kernel allocates 16KB kernel stack when creating a process. In case
> of low memory platforms with tough workloads on userland, this order-2
> allocation request reaches to memory pressure and performance degradation
> simultaenously since VM page allocator falls into slowpath frequently,
> which triggers page reclaim and compaction.
>
> I believe that one of the best solutions is to reduce kernel stack size.
> According to the following data from stack tracer with some fixes, [1],
> a separate IRQ stack would greatly help to decrease a kernel stack depth.
>
Hi Jungseok Lee,
I was working on a similar patch for irq stack, (patch as a follow up email).
I suggest we work together on a single implementation. I think the only
major difference is that you're using sp_el0 as a temporary register to
store a copy of the stack-pointer to find struct thread_info, whereas I was
copying it between stacks (ends up as 2x ldp/stps), which keeps the change
restricted to irq_stack setup code.
We should get some feedback as to which approach is preferred.
Thanks,
James Morse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-07 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 14:23 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: entry: Remove unnecessary calculation for S_SP in EL1h Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48 ` James Morse
2015-09-07 14:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-07 15:51 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 17:12 ` Alexnader Kuleshov
2015-09-07 14:08 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48 ` James Morse
2015-09-08 14:28 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: Reduce kernel stack size when using " Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:33 ` James Morse [this message]
2015-09-07 14:36 ` [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts James Morse
2015-09-07 15:48 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 16:06 ` James Morse
2015-09-07 16:34 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 1:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 6:44 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:59 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 7:51 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:54 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 16:47 ` James Morse
2015-09-09 13:22 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-09 18:13 ` James Morse
2015-09-10 23:30 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 15:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55EDA040.90208@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).