linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: KVM: vgic: Move active state handling to flush_hwstate
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:46:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EDB152.3020204@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EDA2B4.5000903@linaro.org>

On 09/07/2015 04:44 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi,
> On 09/04/2015 04:24 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> We currently set the physical active state only when we *inject* a new
>> pending virtual interrupt, but this is actually not correct, because we
>> could have been preempted and run something else on the system that
>> resets the active state to clear.  This causes us to run the VM with the
>> timer set to fire, but without setting the physical active state.
>>
>> The solution is to always check the LR configurations, and we if have a
>> mapped interrupt in the LR in either the pending or active state
>> (virtual), then set the physical active state.
>>
>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> index 9eb489a..6bd1c9b 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
>> @@ -1144,26 +1144,11 @@ static void vgic_queue_irq_to_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq,
>>  		struct irq_phys_map *map;
>>  		map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, irq);
>>  
>> -		/*
>> -		 * If we have a mapping, and the virtual interrupt is
>> -		 * being injected, then we must set the state to
>> -		 * active in the physical world. Otherwise the
>> -		 * physical interrupt will fire and the guest will
>> -		 * exit before processing the virtual interrupt.
>> -		 */
>>  		if (map) {
>> -			int ret;
>> -
>> -			BUG_ON(!map->active);
> I have a question about this map->active. I did not find any user of
> kvm_vgic_set_phys_irq_active anymore. The flag is directly updated in
> vgic_sync_hwirq through the irq_get_irqchip_state query. In the same
> function, before there is a "BUG_ON(!map || !map->active);"
> 
> Can't we have this BUG_ON firing?
hum ignore that comment. Didn't see the call to
kvm_vgic_set_phys_irq_active in arch_timer.c

Eric
> 
> 
>>  			vlr.hwirq = map->phys_irq;
>>  			vlr.state |= LR_HW;
>>  			vlr.state &= ~LR_EOI_INT;
>>  
>> -			ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>> -						    IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>> -						    true);
>> -			WARN_ON(ret);
>> -
>>  			/*
>>  			 * Make sure we're not going to sample this
>>  			 * again, as a HW-backed interrupt cannot be
>> @@ -1255,7 +1240,7 @@ static void __kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
>>  	unsigned long *pa_percpu, *pa_shared;
>> -	int i, vcpu_id;
>> +	int i, vcpu_id, lr, ret;
>>  	int overflow = 0;
>>  	int nr_shared = vgic_nr_shared_irqs(dist);
>>  
>> @@ -1310,6 +1295,31 @@ epilog:
>>  		 */
>>  		clear_bit(vcpu_id, dist->irq_pending_on_cpu);
>>  	}
>> +
>> +	for (lr = 0; lr < vgic->nr_lr; lr++) {
>> +		struct vgic_lr vlr;
>> +
>> +		if (!test_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * If we have a mapping, and the virtual interrupt is
>> +		 * presented to the guest (as pending or active), then we must
>> +		 * set the state to active in the physical world. See
>> +		 * Documentation/virtual/kvm/arm/vgic-mapped-irqs.txt.
> if upstreamed in 4.3 whereas the other series is not there,
> vgic-mapped-irqs.txt won't be available.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (vlr.state & LR_HW) {
>> +			struct irq_phys_map *map;
>> +			map = vgic_irq_map_search(vcpu, vlr.irq);
>> +
>> +			ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(map->irq,
>> +						    IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
>> +						    true);
> I understand the need for manually setting the phys dist state in case
> of timer however for non shared IRQs, GIC does the job directly. But I
> guess it does not harm.
> 
> Eric
>> +			WARN_ON(ret);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  }
>>  
>>  static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-07 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-04 14:24 [PATCH 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix arthictected timer issues Christoffer Dall
2015-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: KVM: vgic: Move active state handling to flush_hwstate Christoffer Dall
2015-09-07 14:44   ` Eric Auger
2015-09-07 15:46     ` Eric Auger [this message]
2015-09-07 15:54     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm/arm64: KVM: arch timer: Reset CNTV_CTL to 0 Christoffer Dall
2015-09-04 14:47   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-09-04 14:51     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 15:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix arthictected timer issues Marc Zyngier
2015-09-04 15:53   ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55EDB152.3020204@linaro.org \
    --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).