linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts.
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:06:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EDB5FB.8060800@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <400272B6-0733-456F-95C9-9C72C597CEB5@gmail.com>

On 07/09/15 16:48, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:36 PM, James Morse wrote:
> 
> Hi James,
> 
>> Having to handle interrupts on top of an existing kernel stack means the
>> kernel stack must be large enough to accomodate both the maximum kernel
>> usage, and the maximum irq handler usage. Switching to a different stack
>> when processing irqs allows us to make the stack size smaller.
>>
>> Maximum kernel stack usage (running ltp and generating usb+ethernet
>> interrupts) was 7256 bytes. With this patch, the same workload gives
>> a maximum stack usage of 5816 bytes.
> 
> I'd like to know how to measure the max stack depth.
> AFAIK, a stack tracer on ftrace does not work well. Did you dump a stack
> region and find or track down an untouched region? 

I enabled the 'Trace max stack' option under menuconfig 'Kernel Hacking' ->
'Tracers', then looked in debugfs:/tracing/stack_max_size.

What problems did you encounter?
(I may be missing something...)


Thanks,

James

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-07 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-04 14:23 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: entry: Remove unnecessary calculation for S_SP in EL1h Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48   ` James Morse
2015-09-07 14:56   ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-07 15:51     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 17:12   ` Alexnader Kuleshov
2015-09-07 14:08     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48   ` James Morse
2015-09-08 14:28     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: Reduce kernel stack size when using " Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:33 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 James Morse
2015-09-07 14:36   ` [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts James Morse
2015-09-07 15:48     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 16:06       ` James Morse [this message]
2015-09-07 16:34         ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08  1:45           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08  6:44             ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:59             ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08  7:51     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:54     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 16:47       ` James Morse
2015-09-09 13:22         ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-09 18:13           ` James Morse
2015-09-10 23:30             ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 15:42   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55EDB5FB.8060800@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).