From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts.
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:06:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EDB5FB.8060800@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <400272B6-0733-456F-95C9-9C72C597CEB5@gmail.com>
On 07/09/15 16:48, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2015, at 11:36 PM, James Morse wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
>> Having to handle interrupts on top of an existing kernel stack means the
>> kernel stack must be large enough to accomodate both the maximum kernel
>> usage, and the maximum irq handler usage. Switching to a different stack
>> when processing irqs allows us to make the stack size smaller.
>>
>> Maximum kernel stack usage (running ltp and generating usb+ethernet
>> interrupts) was 7256 bytes. With this patch, the same workload gives
>> a maximum stack usage of 5816 bytes.
>
> I'd like to know how to measure the max stack depth.
> AFAIK, a stack tracer on ftrace does not work well. Did you dump a stack
> region and find or track down an untouched region?
I enabled the 'Trace max stack' option under menuconfig 'Kernel Hacking' ->
'Tracers', then looked in debugfs:/tracing/stack_max_size.
What problems did you encounter?
(I may be missing something...)
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-07 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 14:23 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: entry: Remove unnecessary calculation for S_SP in EL1h Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48 ` James Morse
2015-09-07 14:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-07 15:51 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] arm64: Introduce IRQ stack Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 17:12 ` Alexnader Kuleshov
2015-09-07 14:08 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:48 ` James Morse
2015-09-08 14:28 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-04 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: Reduce kernel stack size when using " Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 14:33 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 James Morse
2015-09-07 14:36 ` [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Use a separate stack for irq interrupts James Morse
2015-09-07 15:48 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 16:06 ` James Morse [this message]
2015-09-07 16:34 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 1:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 6:44 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:59 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 7:51 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-09-08 14:54 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-08 16:47 ` James Morse
2015-09-09 13:22 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-09 18:13 ` James Morse
2015-09-10 23:30 ` Jungseok Lee
2015-09-07 15:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Implement IRQ stack on ARM64 Jungseok Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55EDB5FB.8060800@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).