From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip, gicv3: Workaround for Cavium ThunderX erratum 23154
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:41:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EDCC5E.9080203@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150907171501.GD10645@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 07/09/15 18:15, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:54:06PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> On 14/08/15 19:28, Robert Richter wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>>> index c52f7ba205b4..4211c39b8744 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
>>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void gic_redist_wait_for_rwp(void)
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void __maybe_unused gic_write_pmr(u64 val)
>>> {
>>> asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val));
>>> @@ -766,6 +798,12 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
>>> .free = gic_irq_domain_free,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static void gicv3_enable_quirks(void)
>>> +{
>>> + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23154))
>>> + static_key_slow_inc(&is_cavium_thunderx);
>>
>> May be you could use the enable() method added to struct arm64_cpu_capability
>> here to perform the above operation, added by James :
>>
>> commit 1c0763037f1e1caef739e36e09c6d41ed7b61b2d
>> Author: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Date: Tue Jul 21 13:23:28 2015 +0100
>>
>> arm64: kernel: Add cpufeature 'enable' callback
>
> I thought about this as well when looking at the patch but decided it's
> better as it is. The "enable" method is meant to enable per-CPU features
> (or workarounds) but here it is about GICv3, so we don't want to enable
> for every CPU.
Right. I have been playing with a series where the checks are delayed until
all CPUs are brought up. But yes, I understand this usecase is slightly different
and may not match what I was thinking about.
May be, gic can have its own private list of _cpu_capability which it can run
over check_cpu_capabilities(), which it can run over and that will fall back to
what we have at the moment. So, may be what we have here is as good as we can
get.
Cheers
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-07 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-14 18:28 [PATCH v4 0/5] irqchip, gicv3: Updates and Cavium ThunderX errata workarounds Robert Richter
2015-08-14 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] irqchip, gicv3-its: Add range check for number of allocated pages Robert Richter
2015-08-14 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip, gicv3: Workaround for Cavium ThunderX erratum 23154 Robert Richter
2015-08-17 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-08-19 15:43 ` Robert Richter
2015-08-17 17:00 ` David Daney
2015-08-19 16:05 ` Robert Richter
2015-09-07 16:54 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-07 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-07 17:32 ` Robert Richter
2015-09-07 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-07 17:41 ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-09-08 9:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-08 9:09 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-08 9:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-09-08 10:30 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-08-14 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] irqchip, gicv3-its: Read typer register outside the loop Robert Richter
2015-08-14 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] irqchip, gicv3-its: Add HW revision detection and configuration Robert Richter
2015-09-07 16:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-14 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] irqchip, gicv3-its: Workaround for Cavium ThunderX errata 22375, 24313 Robert Richter
2015-09-07 16:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-18 8:33 ` Robert Richter
2015-09-07 16:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] irqchip, gicv3: Updates and Cavium ThunderX errata workarounds Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55EDCC5E.9080203@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).