From: ahs3@redhat.com (Al Stone)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:57:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F08F47.1070906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EDADF5.5060008@arm.com>
On 09/07/2015 09:32 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 19/08/15 23:07, Al Stone wrote:
>
> I finally got a chance to try this series on Juno. Well it exposed a firmware
> bug in MADT table :)
>
> [..]
>
>> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> @@ -245,6 +484,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> table_end) {
>> if (entry->type == entry_id
>> && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
>> + if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Not sure if we can have the above check here unconditionally.
> Currently I can see there are 2 other users of acpi_parse_entries i.e.
> PCC and NUMA. So may be it can be made conditional or return success for
> non-MADT tables from bad_madt_entry ?
So, I went back and double checked the other users and they're looking at
the return value for acpi_parse_entries properly; adding in the check above
unconditionally should not cause any behavior change. Further, despite the
name, acpi_parse_entries is only used to examine MADT subtables. Granted,
we should probably make the name clearer at some point (too ambiguous as to
which entries are parsed right now). Nonetheless, current usage seems to
be in order.
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3 at redhat.com
-----------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-19 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: Provide better MADT subtable sanity checks Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro Al Stone
2015-08-26 15:38 ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-26 20:30 ` Al Stone
2015-09-07 15:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-08 23:00 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 19:57 ` Al Stone [this message]
2015-09-10 16:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-10 20:43 ` Al Stone
2015-09-11 8:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI / ARM64: remove usage of BAD_MADT_ENTRY/BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY Al Stone
2015-08-20 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-20 16:57 ` Al Stone
2015-08-24 10:04 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI / IA64: remove usage of BAD_MADT_ENTRY Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI / X86: " Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: remove definition of BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro Al Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F08F47.1070906@redhat.com \
--to=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).