From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:50:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs
In-Reply-To: <20150909163620.GF3260@x1>
References: <20150811151736.GO18282@x1> <20150812110841.GC20238@linux>
 <20150826120628.GZ19409@x1> <20150902080639.GA26744@linux>
 <CAL_JsqKMGp+3Z+oO6E0YYzjTCb=-R_QM=YF=B33NWayWmV057A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150909062722.GA5266@linux> <20150909075930.GB3260@x1>
 <20150909083031.GB5266@linux> <20150909133930.GE3260@x1>
 <20150909160212.GJ5266@linux> <20150909163620.GF3260@x1>
Message-ID: <55F0C5AB.5060609@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/09/2015 11:36 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?
>>>
>>> NB: Note the suggested new property names.
>>
>> Yeah, all looks fine to me.
> 
> I think these names are better:
> 
>   opp-supply-range-name => opp-microvolt-names
>   opp-cuts              => opp-supported-hw
> 
> Apart from that, the binding is starting to come together.
> 
> Let's see what Rob and Stephen have to say about it.

Seems reasonable to me.

Rob